Table 2.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender (female = 0, male = 1) | 1 | ||||||||
2. Age (adolescents = 0, young adults = 1) | − .07* | 1 | |||||||
3. Pornography use (w1) | .40* | .05 | 1 | ||||||
4. Instrumental sexual attitudes (w1) | .14* | − .01 | .18* | 1 | |||||
5. NCFS relationship partner (w2) | .01 | − .02 | .09* | .09* | 1 | ||||
6. NCFS dating partner (w2) | .07* | − .07* | .11* | .12* | .78* | 1 | |||
7. NCFS friends (w2) | .05 | − .08* | .12* | .12* | .76* | .75* | 1 | ||
8. NCFS stranger (w2) | .14* | − .07* | .24* | .15* | .33* | .55* | .46* | 1 | |
9.NCFS ex-partner (w2) | .13* | − .09* | .16* | .15* | .39* | .59* | .48* | .78* | 1 |
w1 Wave 1, w2 Wave 2, NCFS willingness to engage in NCFS
*p < .01