Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;10:435. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00435

Table 4.

Effect of selected mitocan combinations on primary AML samples.

Patient sample Maximal synergya, mean ± SEM
IACS/VIN RT/2-DG CCCP/DAS ABT-199/LND
AML 1 49.2 ± 18.6 54.7 ± 7.8 27.4 ± 2.8 2.3 ± 0.5
AML 2 50.7 ± 3.2 73.8 ± 3.7 25.0 ± 1.0 17.7 ± 1.1
AML 3 27.0 ± 6.9 50.5 ± 2.6 14.8 ± 4.0 26.9 ± 1.8
AML 4 20.1 ± 9.2 79.7 ± 5.6 7.1 ± 4.2 13.8 ± 11.4
AML 5 10.1 54.3 0 47.7
AML 6 42.1 ± 2.7 81.3 ± 1.0 28.6 ± 3.8 10.5 ± 3.9
AML 7 16.5 ± 8.2 81.5 ± 7.7 11.2 ± 0.8 17.4 ± 4.3
AML 8 40.7 ± 5.7 57.9 ± 2.2 12.9 ± 2.5 7.5 ± 7.5
AML 9 18.3 ± 4.6 78.9 ± 2.4 29.2 ± 15.2 8.9 ± 2.7
AML 10 50.9 78.1 56.2 15.0
AML 11 4.6 ± 0.1 25.6 ± 3.9 33.1 ± 23.0 16.2 ± 11.7
AML 12 46.5 ± 8.9 76.7 ± 6.1 17.1 ± 6.9 0 ± 0
Average 31.4 66.1 21.9 15.3
a

Based on 1–3 independent biological replicates.