Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;20(6):1545. doi: 10.3390/s20061545

Table 2.

Analysis of the GBA data obtained.

Action GBA μV2 Comparison of Means
Basal GBAb * 0.0145 ± 0.0076 -----
Right
Hand
GBAimR * 0.0175 ± 0.0098 t(11) = −1.251, p = 0.237
GBAacR * 0.0185 ± 0.0097
Left
Hand
GBAimL 0.0131 (0.0159) Z = 0.275, p = 0.783
GBAacL * 0.0185 ± 0.0104
Mean
Values
GBAimM * 0.0180 ± 0.0101 t(11) = 1.236, p = 0.242
GBAacM * 0.0185 ± 0.0099

* Normal distribution, Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05).