Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 8;12(3):718. doi: 10.3390/nu12030718

Table 2.

Summary of findings: Effects of identified determinants on sweetness preference.

Sweetness Preference Determinant Studies Overall Findings
No. Consistent Findings?
1. Age 9 Yes • Inline graphic in childhood and elderly populations.
2. Dietary/Nutritional Factors 14 Some • Inline graphic in fasted vs. satiated state.
• Findings for sweetness preference based on dietary macronutrient composition or meal composition were inconsistent.
3. Reproductive Hormonal Factors 7 Some • Possible inverse relationship: Inline graphic with higher levels of progesterone.
4. Genetics/Heritability 9 Some • Heritability accounted for some of the variability in sweetness preference.
• Inconsistent findings with respect to sweetness preference and PROP sensitivity.
5. Body Weight 11 Yes • No association between sweetness preference and BMI status across age groups and genders.
6. Weight Loss 5 No • Inconsistent findings with respect to the effects of weight loss on sweetness preference.
7. Sound 2 N/A • Limited evidence to draw conclusions.
8. Personality Traits 5 No • Inconsistent findings. Limited evidence to draw conclusions.
9. Ethnicity and Lifestyle
• Different Ethnic Groups 5 Yes • Inline graphic among westernized cultures compared to their Asian counterparts.
• Inline graphic may be due to familiarization of foods.
• Traditional/Modern Lifestyles 3 Yes • Inline graphic with a modern vs. traditional lifestyle.
• Inline graphic may be due to familiarization of foods.
• Physical Activity Levels 2 Yes • Inline graphic in individuals who are more vs. less physically active.
10. Previous Sweetness Exposure 6 No • Inconsistent findings.
11. Disease
• Neurological/Psychological 7 No • Inconsistent findings among studies in subjects with a neurological or psychological disease.
• T2DM/GDM 3 No • Limited evidence among studies in individuals with T2DM or GDM to draw conclusions.
Other 2 No • Limited evidence among studies in individuals with other diseases (namely, PWS or end-stage renal disease) to draw conclusions.
12. Other Factors 8 N/A • Study objectives and results were too diverse to draw conclusions.

Inline graphic = increased sweetness preference; Inline graphic = decreased sweetness preference; BMI = body mass index; b/w = between; GDM = gestational diabetes mellitus; N/A = not applicable; No. = number; PROP = 6-n-propylthiouracil; PWS = Prader-Willi Syndrome; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; GDM = Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; vs. = versus.