Table 4.
Linear regression analysis using the top 4 predictors selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator to predict the differences between the interviewer and SMS text messaging assessments.
| Predictors | Difference between interviewer and SMS text messaging assessments, estimate of coefficient (95% CI) | |||
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire (2-item)a | Patient Health Questionnaire (8-item)b | Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (2-item)c | Sheehan Disability Scaled |
| Conscientiousness score ≤4.5 | 1.76 (0.58 to 2.94)e | 2.39 (0.27 to 4.51)e | 1.09 (0.09 to 2.05)e | −3.75 (−8.57 to 1.07) |
| Emotional stability score ≤4.5 | −1.45 (−2.54 to −0.36)e | —f | −1.09 (−2.04 to −0.14)e | — |
| Agreeable score=7 | 1.33 (0.17 to 2.49)e | 2.35 (0.38 to 0.32)e | — | 2.74 (−1.88 to 7.36) |
| Openness to experience score ≥4.5 | — | — | — | 5.51 (0.50 to 10.51)e |
| Personal depression stigma | — | −0.94 (−1.87 to −0.10)e | −0.50 (−0.98 to −0.02)e | — |
| Dysfunctional attitude score | — | — | −0.36 (−1.14 to 0.42) | — |
| Married | — | −2.37 (−4.39 to −0.34)e | — | — |
| Gender | 0.62 (−0.50 to 1.74) | — | — | 1.76 (−2.75 to 6.26) |
aR2 value=0.46, adjusted; R2 value=0.38
bR2 value=0.56, adjusted; R2 value=0.48
cR2 value=0.44, adjusted; R2 value=0.36
dR2 value=0.40, adjusted; R2 value=0.31
eP<.05.
fSome cells are empty because the corresponding variables are not selected into the regression model.