Table 6.
Comparison results with traditional methods on NEU-DET dataset. The bold helps to emphasize the highest data.
Types | AP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBP + NNC | LBP + SVM | HOG + NNC | HOG + SVM | Proposed Method | |
Cr | 0.321 | 0.335 | 0.400 | 0.412 | 0.417 |
In | 0.412 | 0.378 | 0.576 | 0.580 | 0.763 |
Pa | 0.538 | 0.601 | 0.612 | 0.630 | 0.863 |
Ps | 0.446 | 0.515 | 0.438 | 0.328 | 0.851 |
Rs | 0.237 | 0.330 | 0.358 | 0.330 | 0.581 |
Sc | 0.326 | 0.432 | 0.460 | 0.500 | 0.856 |
mAP | 0.380 | 0.432 | 0.474 | 0.463 | 0.724 |