Table 2.
Likert Questionnaire results.
| Items | Median (iqr) | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. with AR | Exp. with HMD | Exp. with VST HMD | ||
| I did not experience double vision | 4 () | 0.195 | 0.434 | 0.158 |
| I perceived VR trajectory as clear and sharp | 4.5 () | 0.029 | 0.029 | 0.066 |
| I was able to contemporaneously focus at the VR Content and Real Objects |
4 () | 0.266 | 0.283 | 0.753 |
| I was able to clearly perceive Depth relations between VR Content and Real Objects |
4 () | 0.167 | 0.076 | 0.110 |
| I perceived the VR content pose stable over the time |
4 () | 0.257 | 0.249 | 0.226 |
| I did not perceive any visual discomfort due to blur |
4 () | 0.200 | 0.421 | 0.499 |
| The latency of the camera mediated view does not compromise the task execution |
5 () | 0.112 | 0.031 | 0.031 |
| I did not experience visual fatigue | 4 () | 0.249 | 0.183 | 0.102 |
| I felt comfortable using this AR guidance modality for the selected task |
4 () | 0.494 | 0.145 | 0.337 |
| I can trust this AR modality to successfully guide manual task |
4 () | 0.581 | 0.160 | 0.392 |
| I am confident of the precision of manual tasks guided by this AR modality |
4 () | 0.535 | 0.299 | 0.682 |