Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;20(6):1783. doi: 10.3390/s20061783

Table 1.

Comparison of the accuracy of the presented algorithm to the algorithms from the literature on the large PPG-DaLia dataset as MAE (bpm). The proposed TDHR algorithm was tested in several versions, with various numbers of analyzed samples N (for all other algorithms N = 256), sampled with a frequency of 32 Hz, with a BPMmin = 40 bpm. The measurements were done every 2 s. For the TDHR algorithm, the accuracy was also calculated for valid measurements, and then the percentage of valid measurements was also given.

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 All
SpaMa [14] 11.86 14.75 9.53 17.2 39.28 16.78 15.88 15.2 17.19 9.08 21.63 12.63 9.5 10.73 12.23 15.56 ± 7.5
SpaMaPlus [15] 8.86 9.67 6.4 14.1 24.06 11.34 6.31 11.25 16.04 6.17 15.15 12.03 8.5 7.76 8.29 11.06 ± 4.8
Schaeck 2017 [23] 33.05 27.81 18.49 28.82 12.64 8.72 20.65 21.75 22.25 12.6 21.05 22.74 27.71 12.05 16.4 20.45 ± 7.1
CNN average [15] 8.45 7.92 5.96 7.86 18.97 13.55 5.16 11.49 10.65 6.07 9.87 9.95 5.25 5.85 5.25 8.82 ± 3.8
CNN ensemble [15] 7.73 6.74 4.03 5.9 18.51 12.88 3.91 10.87 8.79 4.03 9.22 9.35 4.29 4.37 4.17 7.65 ± 4.2
TDHR
N = 1024
8.10 7.98 10.51 11.82 20.60 12.11 7.62 11.71 14.79 4.92 20.05 8.76 7.88 9.15 8.45 10.96 ± 4.49
TDHR
N = 1024
only valid measurements (%)
5.32
74%
4.99
86%
6.47
71%
6.57
72%
16.26
43%
8.29
55%
5.40
80%
10.28
80%
6.93
64%
3.01
81%
9.17
66%
5.22
61%
4.70
83%
4.84
79%
4.12
75%
6.77 ± 3.26
72%
TDHR
N = 512
8.61 7.49 11.55 11.93 20.79 14.24 7.96 11.91 14.95 5.83 19.60 8.86 8.22 9.10 8.66 11.31 ± 4.41
TDHR
N = 512
only valid measurements (%)
6.00
74%
5.60
86%
7.72
73%
7.55
71%
16.05
58%
9.62
65%
6.01
81%
10.50
79%
8.79
65%
3.71
80%
12.15
71%
5.65
62%
5.27
84%
5.34
78%
4.82
75%
7.65 ± 3.30
74%
TDHR
N = 256
11.08 10.84 11.63 14.06 21.67 15.63 8.86 13.30 15.12 7.27 21.08 10.49 9.54 10.24 9.04 12.66 ± 4.25
TDHR
N = 256
only valid measurements (%)
8.40
74%
8.21
86%
9.40
75%
10.10
73%
17.02
69%
12.85
72%
7.57
83%
12.04
78%
11.75
68%
5.14
79%
13.86
74%
7.73
62%
7.33
84%
7.45
81%
6.63
74%
9.70 ± 3.21
76%
TDHR
N = 128
13.13 13.57 13.11 15.59 25.55 18.05 10.25 16.19 19.23 10.32 19.39 12.64 11.63 12.33 12.80 14.92 ± 4.16
TDHR
N = 128
only valid measurements (%)
12.71
80%
12.25
89%
11.93
82%
14.05
80%
20.84
82%
16.44
79%
9.53
86%
15.65
83%
17.53
78%
8.75
85%
17.13
82%
12.02
72%
10.29
86%
10.66
85%
10.73
80%
13.37 ± 3.46
82%