Table 3.
Results for SEM of latent Metals regressed on latent Antibody as shown in Fig. 2
| Associations | Overall (n = 498) | Girls (n = 246) | Boys (n = 255) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latent antibody β (95% CI) | p-value | Latent antibody β (95% CI) | p-value | Latent antibody β (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Latent metal mixture | ||||||
| Unadjusted | −0.16 (− 0.26, − 0.05) | 0.003 | −0.26 (− 0.4, − 0.131) | <.001 | −0.04 (− 0.2, 0.12) | 0.62 |
| Adjusted | −0.14 (− 0.25, − 0.03) | 0.01 | −0.31 (− 0.45, − 0.17) | <.001 | 0.02 (− 0.14, 0.17) | 0.82 |
Note: Covariates in adjusted model include maternal education, breastfeeding duration, and child sex (overall model only)
Fit indices for all models: CFI: 0.96–0.99; TLI = 0.95–0.98; RMSEA: 0.04–0.05