Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;20:99. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01235-w

Table 3.

Comparison of transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization of patients with BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma after propensity score matching

Variable TACE+RFA (n = 56) TACE (n = 231) P-value
Male 42 (75.0) 173 (74.9) 0.987
Age (years) 64 (28–86) 64 (29–91) 0.672
Smoking 27 (47.4) 113 (48.9) 0.925
Alcohol use 23 (40.4) 100 (43.3) 0.763
HBV positive 32 (56.1) 103 (44.6) 0.091
HCV positive 21 (36.8) 90 (39.0) 0.085
Total Bilirubin 1.41 ± 0.67 1.34 ± 1.14 0.643
INR 1.10 ± 0.14 1.06 ± 0.12 0.060
Cirrhosis 43 (75.4) 155 (67.1) 0.160
Child-Pugh class A 43 (76.8) 194 (84.0) 0.203
Tumor size 5.5 ± 2.6 7.0 ± 3.8 0.062
Tumor size≥5 cm 25 (44.6) 149 (64.5) 0.053
Tumor number (≥3) 50 (89.3) 178 (77.1) 0.051
AFP (ng/mL) ≥ 200 6 (10.7) 50 (21.6) 0.064
Mortality 34 (59.6) 173 (74..9) 0.034
Follow up times (months) 36 (3–95) 22 (1–97) < 0.0001

BCLC stage: Barcelona clinic liver cancer; SR Surgical resection; TACE Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; RFA Radiofrequency ablation; HBV Hepatitis B virus; HCV Hepatitis C virus; AFP: INR International normalize ratio; Alpha-fetoprotein;