Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 3;11:332. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00332

Table 1.

Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of probiotics versus placebo in irritable bowel syndrome.

Study Year Country Type of IBS(%) diagnostic criteria for IBS recruitment Sample size Sex (Male/Female) Age[years],mean ± SD Probiotic Probiotic dosage(CFU/D) Duration of therapy Criteria used to define symptom improvement following therapy or response Outcome
Probiotic Placebo
Gade and Thorn (1989) 1989 Denmark all types Manning Primary care 54 5/27 7/15 34 Streptococcus faecium Not stated 4 weeks IBS symptoms “improved” Improvement in IBS symptoms
Adverse events
Nobaek et al. (2006) 2000 Sweden all types Rome I Advertisement 52 9/16 7/20 51 Lactobacillus plantarum 5×107 4 weeks > 1.5 improvement in VAS scale for
abdominal pain, and continuous
scale for IBS symptoms
Abdominal pain(VAS)
Niedzielin et al. (2001) 2001 Poland all types clinical diagnosis Primary care 40 5/15 3/17 45 Lactobacillus plantarum 2×1010 4 weeks improvement in IBS symptoms Improvement in IBS symptoms
Adverse events
Kim et al. (2003) 2003 USA D:100 Rome II Secondary care 25 2/10 5/8 42.8 ± 16.7 Combination 9×1011 8 weeks Satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms for 50% of weeks, and continuous scale for IBS symptoms Response(Satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms for 50% of weeks)
Overall symptoms score
Bloating(100-mm VAS)
Abdominal pain(100-mm VAS)
Adverse events
Kajander et al. (2005) 2005 Finland D:48
C:23
A:29
Rome I and II Advertising 103 13/39 11/40 46 Combination 8–9×109 6 months Relief of IBS symptoms, and continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Abdominal pain(a 4-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Kim et al. (2005) 2005 USA D:42
C:33
A:25
Rome II Secondary care and advertising 48 3/21 0/24 43 Combination 9×1011 4-8 weeks Satisfactory relief of IBS symptom for 50% of weeks Response(Satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms for 50% of weeks)
Bloating(100-mmVAS)
Abdominal pain(100-mmVAS)
Adverse events
Niv et al. (2005) 2005 Israel D:37
C:18.5
M:44.4
Rome II Secondary care 54 7/20 11/16 45.6 L. reuteri ATCC 55730 4×108 for 1wk, then 2×108 6 months continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Adverse events
O'Mahony et al. (2005) 2005 Ireland D:28
C:26
A:45
Rome II Secondary care 75 not stated 44.3 L. salivarius UCC4331 or B. infantis 35624 1×1010 8 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Abdominal pain(7-point Likert score)
Bloating(7-pointLikert score)
Adverse events
Kim et al. (2006) 2006 Korea D:70
A:30
clinical diagnosis Secondary care 34 14/3 11/6 39.35 ± 11.9 Combination 3×109(Bacillus subtilis)
2.7×1010(Streptococcus faecium)
4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Bloating(10-pointVAS)
Abdominal pain(10-pointVAS)
Adverse events
Simren and Lindh (2006) 2006 Sweden all types Rome II Advertising 76 not stated 40 L.plantarum DSM 9843 2×1010 6 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score(IBS-SSS)
Whorwell et al. (2006) 2006 UK D:55.5
C:20.7
A:23.8
Rome II Primary care 362 0/270 0/92 41.9 ± 10.46 B. infantis 35624 1×106,1×108,1×1010 4 weeks Subjects' Global Assessment (SGA) of IBS symptoms,and continuous scale symptoms for IBS Response(SGA)
Global symptoms score
Bloating(a 6-point numerical scale)
Abdominal pain(a 6-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Guyonnet et al. (2007) 2007 France C:100 Rome II Primary care 267 29/106 39/93 49.3 ± 11.4 Combination B. animalis DN173010 (1.25×1010 c.f.u./125 g) S. thermophilus (1.2×109 c.f.u./125 g) and L. bulgaricus (1.2×109 c.f.u./125 g) b.i.d. 6 weeks improvement at least 10% vs. baseline Response(improvement at least 10% vs. baseline)
Global symptoms score(a 7-pointLikert score)
Bloating(a 7-Likert score)
Abdominal pain(a 7-Likert score)
Adverse events
Drouault-Holowacz et al. (2007) 2007 France D:29
C:29
A:41
non-classified:1%
Rome II Not stated 100 8/40 16/36 45.4 ± 14 Combination 1 × 1010 4 weeks Satisfactory relief of global IBS symptoms Satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms
Abdominal pain(a 4-pointLikert score)
Enck et al. (2008) 2008 Germany all types Primary care physicians Primary care 297 77/72 73/75 49.6 ± 13.6 Enterococcus faecalis DSM16440 and Escherichia coli DSM17252 (3.0-9.0×107c.f.u./1.5 ml)×0.75 ml t.i.d. for 1 week, then 1.5 ml t.i.d. for weeks 2 and 3, then 2.25 ml t.i.d. for weeks 3–8 8 weeks 50% improvement in IBS global symptoms,and continuous scale symptoms for IBS Response(50% improvement in IBS global symptoms)
Global symptoms score(GSS)
Adverse events
Kajander et al. (2008) 2008 Finland D:45
C:30
A:25
Rome II Primary care 86 2/41 4/39 48 ± 13 Combination 1 × 107 20 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Flatulence(a 5-point numerical scale)
Distension(a 5-point numerical scale)
abdominal pain(a 5-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Sinn et al. (2008) 2008 Korea D:20
C:27.5
M:62.5
Rome III Secondary care 40 6/14 8/12 44.7 ± 13 L. acidophilus SDC 2012 and 2013 4×109 4 weeks Any reduction in abdominal pain score Response(Any reduction in abdominal pain score)
Abdominal pain(a 6-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Zeng et al. (2008) 2008 China D:100 Rome II Tertiary care 29 10/4 9/6 45.2 ± 10.7 Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium Longum S.thermophilus (4×1010 c.f.u.),
L. bulgaricus (4×109 c.f.u.),
L. acidophilus (4×109 c.f.u.),
and B. longum (4×109 c.f.u.)
4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Bloating(100-mm VAS)
Abdominal pain(100-mm VAS)
Adverse events
Agrawal et al. (2009) 2009 UK C:100 Rome III Tertiary care 34 0/17 0/17 39.4 ± 10.6 Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173 010
Streptococcus thermophilus
and Lactobacillus bulgaricus
B. lactis DN-173 010(2.5×1010 c.f.u.),
S.thermophilus (2.4×109 c.f.u.),
L. bulgaricus (2.4×109 c.f.u.),
4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Bloating(a 6-point numerical scale)
Flatulence(a 6-point numerical scale)
Abdominal pain(a 6-point numerical scale)
Enck et al. (2009) 2009 Germany All types Kruis score Primary care 298 76/72 75/75 49.6 ± 13.6 E. coli DSM17252 (1.5–4.5×107 c.f.u./ml) 0.75 ml drops t.i.d. for 1 week, then 1.5 ml t.i.d. for weeks 2–8 8 weeks No longer having IBS symptoms Response(no longer having IBS symptoms)
General symptom score
Adverse events
Hong et al. (2009) 2009 Korea D:45.7
C:20
M:8.6
non-classified:25.7
Rome III tertiary care 70 25/11 22/12 37 ± 14.85 Combination 4×1010 8 weeks Reduction of symptom score by at least 50% Response(Reduction of symptom score by at least 50%)
Adverse events
Williams et al. (2009) 2009 UK D:11.5C:27
A:61.5
Rome II Advertising 52 3/25 4/20 39 ± 11.5 Combination 2.5×1010 8 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptom score
Simrén et al. (2010) 2010 Sweden D:35
C:15
M:50
Rome II Tertiary care 74 11/26 11/26 43 ± 15.43 Combination 2×1010 8 weeks Adequate relief of their IBS symptoms at least 50% of the weeks Response(Adequate relief of their IBS symptoms)
Global symptom score
Abdominal pain(100-mm VAS)
Bloating(100-mm VAS)
Adverse events
Choi et al. (2011) 2011 Korea D:71.6
M:28.4
Rome II Tertiary care 90 18/17 19/20 40.4 ± 12.9 Saccharomyces boulardii 4×1011 4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score(7-point Likert scale)
Bloating(7-point Likert scale)
Abdominal pain(7-point Likert scale)
Adverse events
Guglielmetti et al. (2011) 2011 Germany D:21.3
C:19.7
M:58.2
non-classified:0.8
Rome III Secondary care and advertising 122 19/41 21/41 38.9 ± 12.75 B. bifidum MIMBb75 1×109 4 weeks Improvement in average weekly global IBS symptom score of 1 or more for 50% of weeks, and continuous scale for IBS symptoms Response(Improvement in average weekly global IBS symptom score of 1 or more for 50% of weeks)
Global symptoms score(7-point Likert score)
Bloating(7-point Likert scale)
Abdominal pain(7-point Likert scale)
Adverse events
Michail and Kenche (2011) 2011 USA D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 24 5/10 3/6 21.8 ± 17 Combination 9×1011 8 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score(a clinical rating scale GSRS)
Bloating(GSRS)
Abdominal pain(GSRS)
Adverse events
Sondergaard et al. (2011) 2011 Denmark and Sweden all types Rome II Primary and secondary care 52 7/20 6/19 51.3± 9.5 Combination 2.5×1010 8 weeks Adequate relief of IBS symptoms and continuous scale for IBS symptoms Adequate relief of IBS symptoms
Global symptoms score(IBS SSI Francis et al)
Abdominal pain(100-mm VAS)
Cha et al. (2012) 2012 Korea D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 50 12/13 14/11 39.1 ± 11.76 Combination 1×1010 8 weeks Adequate relief of their IBS symptoms at least 50% of the weeks
and continuous scale for IBS symptoms
Response(Adequate relief of their IBS symptoms at least 50% of the weeks)
Global symptoms score(10-point VAS)
Abdominal pain(10-point VAS)
Bloating(10-point VAS)
Adverse events
Cui et al. (2012) 2012 China D:48.3
C:20
M:11.7
non-classified:10
Rome III Tertiary care 60 11/26 7/16 44.66 ± 15.23 Combination 1.5×107 4 weeks reduction of symptom score by at least 30% Improvement in IBS symptoms
Dapoigny et al. (2012) 2012 France D:30
C:22
M:34
U:14
Rome III Tertiary care 50 5/20 10/15 47.05± 10.98 Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus LCR35 6×108 4 weeks IBS severity score reduced by at least 50% Response (IBS severity score reduced by at least 50%)
Adverse events
Ducrotte et al. (2012) 2012 India all types Rome III Primary care 214 70/38 81/25 37.28± 12.6 L. plantarum LP299V DSM 9843 1×1011 4 weeks Patients rated treatment efficacy as excellent or good Global assessment of treatment efficacy
Adverse events
Farup et al. (2012) 2012 Norway D:37.5
C:6.25
A:56.25
Rome II Secondary care 28 Not stated Not stated 50± 11 L. plantarum MF 1298 1×1010 3 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score
Kruis et al. (2012) 2012 Germany all types Rome II Tertiary care 120 12/48 16/44 45.7± 12.4 E. coli Nissle 1917 2.5–25×109 for 4 days then 5–50×109 for 12 weeks 12 weeks Patients reported contented with treatment Response (Patients reported contented with treatment)
Adverse events
Amirimani et al. (2013) 2013 Iran all types Rome III Secondary care 102 21/32 15/24 41.8± 12.5 Lactobacillus reuteri 1×1011 4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(questionare)
Bloating(questionare)
Adverse events
Begtrup et al. (2013) 2013 Denmark D:40
C:19
M:38
U:2
Rome III Primary care 131 51/16 46/18 30.52± 9.42 Combination 5.2×1010 6 months Adequate relief of global IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the time, and continuous scale for IBS symptoms Response (Adequate relief of global IBS symptoms)
Global symptoms score
Abdominal pain(GSRS-IBS)
Bloating(GSRS-IBS)
Adverse events
Charbonneau et al. (2013) 2013 Ireland all types Rome II Population based 76 8/31 6/31 45.5± 11 B. infantis 35624 1×109 8 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptom severity(a six-point scale)
Abdominal pain((a six-point numerical scale)
Bloating(a six-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Roberts et al. (2013) 2013 UK C and M ROME III Primary care 179 13/75 14/77 44.18± 12.36 Bifidobacterium lactis CNCM I-2494
S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus
2.5×1010
2.4×109
2.4×109
12 weeks Subjective global assessment (SGA) of symptom relief Subjective global assessment (SGA) of symptom relief
IBS-SSS
Abdominal pain(6 point Likert scale)
Bloating(6 point Likert scale)
Abbas et al. (2014) 2014 Pakistan D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 72 27/10 26/9 35.4± 11.9 Saccharomyces boulardii 3×109 6 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(a 4-point scale)
Bloating(a 4-point scale)
Adverse events
Jafari et al. (2014) 2014 India all types Rome III Secondary care 108 21/33 22/32 36.7± 11.5 Combination 8×109 4 weeks Satisfactory relief of global IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the time Relief of IBS symptoms
Abdominal pain(100-mm VAS)
Bloating(100-mm VAS)
Lorenzo-Zuniga et al. (2014) 2014 Spain D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 84 16/39 15/14 46.8± 12.5 Combination high dose (1-3×1010)
low dose (3-6×109)
6 weeks “Considerably relieved” or “completely relieved” of global IBS symptoms for at least 50% of the time Health-related quality of life(a specifc questionnaire ranging from 1-100)
Respond(relief of symptoms)
Adverse events
Ludidi et al. (2014) 2014 Netherlands all types Rome III Secondary care and advertising 40 6/15 7/12 40.5± 14.4 Combination 5×109 6 weeks A 30% or greater improvement in mean symptom composite score(MSS) Respond(mean symptom composite score MSS)
Pedersen et al. (2014) 2014 Denmark D:38
C:17.3
A:40.7
non-classified:4
Rome III Tertiary care 81 14/27 11/29 Not stated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG 1.2×1010 6 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms IBS-SSS
Shavakhi et al. (2014) 2014 Iran D:32.6
C:45.7
A:21.7
Rome II Tertiary care 129 20/46 24/39 36.2± 9.2 Combination 2×108 2 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(a 4-point scale)
Distension(a 4-point scale)
Sisson et al. (2014) 2014 UK D:37.6
C:21.5
M:35.5
U:5.4
Rome III Primary care and secondary care 186 40/84 17/45 38.3± 10.6 Combination 2×108/kg 12 weeks Patients reported mild or no symptoms Respond(IBS-SSS)
IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Abdominal pain(IBS-SSS)
Bloating(IBS-SSS)
Adverse events
Stevenson et al. (2014) 2014 South Africa D:37.6
C:21.5
Rome II Secondary care 81 2/52 0/27 47.9± 13 Lactobacillus plantarum 299 v 1×1010 8 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Adverse events
Yoon et al. (2014) 2014 Korea D:53.1
C40.8
M:6.1
Rome III Tertiary care 49 11/14 6/18 44.5± 14.3 Combination 1×1010 4 weeks Global relief of IBS symptoms Global relief of IBS symptoms
Abdominal pain(a 10-point numerical scale)
Bloating(a 10-point numerical scale)
Adverse events
Faghihi et al. (2015) 2015 Iran D:35.3
C39.6
M:25.1
Rome II Secondary care 139 Not stated Not stated 38± 13.3 Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 Not stated 6 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Global symptoms score(Birmingham IBS Symptom Questionnaire)
Pineton de Chambrun et al. (2015) 2015 France D:28.5
C46.9
M:24.6
Rome III Not stated 179 14/72 11/82 44± 13.3 Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 4×109 8 weeks A reduction in the abdominal pain score of 1 arbitrary unit (au) for at least 50% of the time Improvement in IBS symptoms
Abdominal pain(7-point Likert scale)
Adverse events
Yoon et al. (2015) 2015 Korea D:48.1
C:18.5
M:21
U:12.4
Rome III Tertiary care 80 24/17 19/20 59.3± 12.2 Combination 1×1010 4 weeks Adequate relief of global IBS symptoms Adequate relief of global IBS symptoms
Global symptoms score(10-point VAS)
Abdominal pain(10-point VAS)
Bloating(10-point VAS)
Lyra et al. (2016) 2016 Finland D:38.9
C:16.6
M:44
U:0.5
Rome III Primary care 391 62/198 37/94 47.9± 12.9 L.acidophilus NCFM (ATCC 700396) low-dose: 1×109
high-dose: 1×1010
12 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Abdominal pain(IBS-SSS)
Bloating(IBS-SSS)
Adverse events
Majeed et al. (2016) 2016 India D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 36 7/11 10/8 35.8± 10.8 Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 2×109 90 days Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(Questionnaire)
Bloating(Questionnaire)
Adverse events
Mezzasalma et al. (2016) 2016 Italy C:100 Rome III Not stated 150 Not stated Not stated 37.4± 12.5 1: L.acidophilus, L. reuteri
2: L.plantarum, L. rhamnosus, B. animalis subsp. Lactis
1: 1×1010
2: 1.5×1010
60 days A decrease of abdominal pain of at least 30% compared to the basal condition for at least 50% of the intervention time Response(the subject reporting a decrease of symptoms of at least 30% compared to the basal condition for at least 50% of the intervention time)
Spiller et al. (2016) 2016 France D:20.8
C47.5
M:31.7
Rome III Primary care and secondary care 379 31/161 31/156 45.3± 14.9 Saccharomyces cerevisiae I-3856 8×109 12 weeks An improvement of 50% of the weekly average''intestinal pain/discomfort score'' compared with baseline average score for at least 4 out of the last 8 weeks of the study Response
Global symptoms score
Abdominal pain(8-point Likert scale)
Bloating(8-point Likert scale)
Adverse events
Thijssen et al. (2016) 2016 Netherlands D:30
C:25
A:28.75
U:16.25
Rome II Secondary care,tertiary care, and advertising 80 13/26 12/29 41.8± 14.1 Lactobacillus casei Shirota 1.3×1010 8 weeks An mean symptom score(MSS) decrease of at least 30% Response (An mean symptom score(MSS) decrease of at least 30%)
Hod et al. (2017) 2017 Israel D:100 Rome III Community and secondary and tertiary care 107 0/54 0/53 Not extractable Combination 5×1010 8 weeks improvement in symptoms for at least 50%
of the tme
Response
Adverse events
Ishaque et al. (2018) 2018 Bangladesh D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 360 136/45 145/34 31.9 ± 9.9 Combination 8×109 16weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Abdominal pain(IBS-SSS)
Adverse events
Khodadoostan et al. (2018) 2018 Iran D:100 Rome III Secondary care and tertiary care 67 21/12 22/12 34.1 ± 11.0 Combination 2×109 6 months Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(10-point VAS)
Kim et al. (2018) 2018 Korea not stated not stated Advertising 42 19/11 6/6 32.7 ± 6.6 Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 low-dose: 1×109
high-dose: 1×1010
4 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms Abdominal pain(5-point Likert scale)
Bloating(5-point Likert scale)
Preston et al. (2018) 2018 USA D:46.4
C:35.7
M:18.6
Rome III Tertiary care 113 47/29 21/16 40.4 ± 13.5 Combination 1×1011 6 weeks Continuous scale for IBS symptoms IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Abdominal pain(IBS-SSS)
Adverse events
Sun et al. (2018) 2018 China D:100 Rome III Tertiary care 200 63/42 53/42 43.9 ± 12.7 Clostridium butyricum 5.67×107 4 weeks A reduction of ≥50 points of total IBS-SSS score Response (A reduction of ≥50 points of total IBS-SSS score)
IBS symptom severity scores (IBS-SSS)
Abdominal pain(IBS-SSS)
Bloating(IBS-SSS)
Adverse events