TABLE 3.
Results Of 2 × 6 (User Group × Perceived Effectiveness) Mixed-Model ANOVA On Participants’ Beliefs Regarding Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) For Improving Domain-Specific Cognition.
| Cognitive Domain | CCT Never Users M (SE) N = 292 | CCT Past/Present Users M (SE) N = 193 | Regardless of Use History M (SE) N = 485 | Within-Subject Pairwise Comparisons Regardless of Use History Standard Mean Difference d (SE) |
||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| (1) Attention | 4.22 (0.09) | 4.46 (0.11) | 4.34 (0.07) | – | – | – | – | – |
| (2) Memory | 4.22 (0.09) | 4.46 (0.12) | 4.34 (0.08) | 0 (0.06) | – | – | – | – |
| (3) Reasoning | 3.97 (0.09) | 4.09 (0.11) | 4.03 (0.07) | 0.27 (0.06)* | 0.25 (0.06)* | – | – | – |
| (4) Multi-tasking | 3.92 (0.09) | 3.95 (0.11) | 3.94 (0.07) | 0.35 (0.06)* | 0.29 (0.06)* | 0.08 (0.06) | – | – |
| (5) Intelligence | 3.68 (0.10) | 3.86 (0.13) | 3.77 (0.08) | 0.42 (0.07)* | 0.41 (0.06)* | 0.21 (0.06)* | 0.11 (0.06) | – |
| (6) Social cognition | 3.49 (0.10) | 3.36 (0.12) | 3.42 (0.08) | 0.68 (0.07)* | 0.61 (0.07)* | 0.52 (0.07)* | 0.38 (0.06)* | 0.24 (0.06)* |
M, mean; SE, standard error. * p < 0.001. Bold items represent statistically significant pairwise differences.