Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 18;46(3):496–504. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz090

Table 2.

Results of Comparison of Dichotomous Variables (Chi-Square Test)

Variable Drug Studies, n/Na (%) Psychotherapy Studies, n/Na (%) χ 2 P
Use of operationalized criteria for diagnosis 76/80 (95) 42/54 (77.8) 7.53 .006
Only inpatients included 64/74 (86.49) 10/39 (25.64) 39.19 <.0001
Intervention administered in monotherapy 80/80 (100) 1/52 (1.89) 124.79 <.0001
High risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel 0/80 (0)b 54/54 (100) 129.88 <.0001
High risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessment 0/80 (0)b 14/54 (25.92) 20.47 <.0001
High risk of bias for incomplete outcome data 5/80 (6.25) 35/54 (64.81) 50.05 <.0001
High risk of bias for selective reporting 10/80 (12.5) 19/54 (35.19) 8.49 .0035
Public funded 1/61 (1.6) 33/40 (82.5) 67.16 <.0001
Conflict of interest 60/78 (76.92) 35/53 (66.04) 1.36 .2418

Note: aDenominator is not always equal to the total number of studies because only studies reporting the corresponding information were used for each analysis.

bThe studies in this review were double blinded by inclusion criteria.