Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;46(3):603–611. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz048

Table 1.

Positive selection signals of each SNP

No.a rsID Chr Pos.b P-valc Tajima’s D |DDAF| FST XPCLR |UiHS| |UXPEHH| Sum Protective or risk
c7 rs7951870 11 46 373 311 8.25 E-11 2 7 3 5 2 5 24 Risk
b18 rs11223651 11 133 841 034 2.42 E-11 7 0 3 2 5 1 18 Risk
f7 rs7801375 7 131 567 263 2.26 E-08 4 4 3 3 1 3 18 Protective
c18 rs4766428 12 110 723 245 7.09 E-10 3 6 0 5 0 3 17 Risk
e8 rs9922678 16 9 946 319 6.72 E-09 3 6 1 1 4 1 16 Protective
c12 rs11577346 1 150 066 530 1.47 E-09 5 0 4 3 1 2 15 Protective
e9 rs2068012 14 30 190 316 4.14 E-08 6 0 0 0 7 2 15 Risk
a8 rs4391122 5 60 598 543 1.73 E-13 3 6 0 3 1 2 15 Risk
a11 rs4702 15 91 426 560 2.30 E-12 0 4 0 3 4 4 15 Protective
b1 rs7893279 10 18 745 105 3.56 E-11 0 0 1 4 9 1 15 Protective

Note: Five SNPs were risk and the other 5 SNPs are protective from schizophrenia. Each number refers to total positive selection signals of all 14 populations for each SNP.

|DDAF|, derived allele frequency; FST, fixation index; XPCLR, cross-population composite likelihood ratio; |UiHS|, integrated haplotype score; |UXPEHH|, cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity.

aTen SNPs exceeded the threshold of 15 positive selection signals to be statistically significant.

bThe UCSC hg19/NCBI build 37 position of the SNP.

cThe P-values of the SNP from the PGC2-SCZ GWAS.