Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;5(1):e0036. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00036

TABLE II.

Regional Differences Among the Skeletal Sites*

Fracture Group (N = 110) Control Group (N = 95)
T-Score P Value (Vs. Spine) P Value (Vs. Hip) T-Score P Value (Vs. Spine) P Value (Vs. Hip)
Distal forearm region
 Ultra-distal radius −2.5 ± 1.0 0.012 <0.001 −1.8 ± 1.3 >0.999 <0.001
57% (63/110) 0.007§§ 0.010§ 33% (31/95) 0.229 0.005§§
 One-third distal radius −2.5 ± 1.6 0.036 0.024 −1.6 ± 1.9 0.252 <0.001
58% (64/110) 0.005§§ 0.007§§ 37% (35/95) 0.552 0.029§
 Mid-distal radius −3.3 ± 1.4 <0.001 <0.001 −2.3 ± 1.7 0.066 >0.999
71% (78/110) <0.001§§ <0.001§§ 49% (47/95) 0.224 0.663
Spine
 Lumbar spine −2.1 ± 1.2 −1.9 ± 1.6
39% (43/110) 41% (39/95)
Hip
 Femoral neck −2.1 ± 0.8 −2.3 ± 1.3
40% (44/110) 53% (50/95)
*

T-score values are given as the mean and standard deviation and are shown with the proportion of patients in the group with a T-score of ≤−2.5 SD for the given region. Bold indicates significant p values, with lower T-scores or higher proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤−2.5 SD for the fracture group compared with the control group.

P < 0.05, and

p < 0.01; significant difference by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

§

P < 0.05, and

§§

p < 0.01; significant difference by Pearson chi-square test.