Table 2.
Flow From Country A to Country B | Positive Effects | Negative Effects | Corrective Actions |
---|---|---|---|
Government Responsibilities | |||
State of Diplomatic Relations | Nil | Often poor | Diplomatic initiatives needed to increase destination attractiveness |
Currency | Reduced value of Rupiah stimulated tourism | Nil | Not required to attract tourists but needed to stimulate the domestic economy |
Promotion | Nil | Promotion ceased | Need for government funding to reverse falling visitor numbers |
Government Regulations including crime and national park protection | Nil | Non enforcement created poor national image | Action required to reduce corruption and increase internal security |
Security | Nil | Uncertainty about tourist security during the 1997 Jakarta riots and 2002 Bali bombings | Enhance security required in tourism areas to ensure the safety of tourist |
Economic Policy | Nil | Poor, created impression of poorly run country | Need to introduce new economic policies (Indonesia appealed to IMF for assistance) |
Note: This example only examines the government responsibilities of the bilateral framework outlined in Table 1, whose factors require a comprehensive consideration of all factors outlined in Figure 2.