Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 22;32(3):780–801. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.008

Table 2.

Example of a Framework for Evaluating Bilateral Tourism

Flow From Country A to Country B Positive Effects Negative Effects Corrective Actions
Government Responsibilities
State of Diplomatic Relations Nil Often poor Diplomatic initiatives needed to increase destination attractiveness
Currency Reduced value of Rupiah stimulated tourism Nil Not required to attract tourists but needed to stimulate the domestic economy
Promotion Nil Promotion ceased Need for government funding to reverse falling visitor numbers
Government Regulations including crime and national park protection Nil Non enforcement created poor national image Action required to reduce corruption and increase internal security
Security Nil Uncertainty about tourist security during the 1997 Jakarta riots and 2002 Bali bombings Enhance security required in tourism areas to ensure the safety of tourist
Economic Policy Nil Poor, created impression of poorly run country Need to introduce new economic policies (Indonesia appealed to IMF for assistance)

Note: This example only examines the government responsibilities of the bilateral framework outlined in Table 1, whose factors require a comprehensive consideration of all factors outlined in Figure 2.