Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 28;36:154–171. doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2015.12.002

Table 2.

No-remaining nonlinearity test.

Null hypothesis r = 1 r = 1 r = 1 r = 1 r = 1 r = 1
Alternative hypothesis r = 2 r = 2 r = 2 r = 2 r = 2 r = 2
No. of location parameters (m) m = 1 m = 2 m = 1 m = 2 m = 1 m = 2
Lag length of transition variable Transition variable Transition variable Transition variable
CDS VIX TED spread
d = 0 6.813 [0.00] 9.48 [0.00] 3.960 [0.01] 11.22 [0.00] 6.954 [0.00] 6.456 [0.00]
d = 1 2.349 [0.07] 12.06 [0.00] 14.00 [0.00] 13.84 [0.00] 0.072 [0.98] 6.728 [0.00]
d = 2 3.389 [0.02] 12.85 [0.00] 9.725 [0.00] 16.45 [0.00] 1.802 [0.15] 3.022 [0.01]
d = 3 8.517 [0.00] 10.26 [0.00] 12.08 [0.00] 7.397 [0.00] 4.04 [0.01] 8.268 [0.00]
d = 4 5.484 [0.00] 12.19 [0.00] 4.014 [0.01] 7.221 [0.00] 5.598 [0.00] 0.007 [1.00]
d = 5 4.557 [0.01] 3.988 [0.00] 5.406 [0.00] 21.52 [0.00] 8.759 [0.00] 10.32 [0.00]
d = 6 1.125 [0.34] 15.19 [0.00] 5.966 [0.00] 11.38 [0.00] 23.65 [0.00] 6.931 [0.00]

Note: The test statistic is LMF. r denotes the number of transition functions. The digits in brackets are the P-values. The significance level is specified at 5%.