Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;2020(4):CD002201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002201.pub6

Henderson 1994.

Methods RCT.
Design: parallel with 4 arms.
Duration: 6‐weeks.
Location: single centre in the USA (Children's Hospital Medical Center, Seattle).
Participants 12 children and young adults diagnosed with CF on genotype or sweat test, pancreatic insufficiency and able to complete the spirometric tests.
Age, mean (SD): age 12.2 (5.4) years.
Gender: 7 males, 5 females.
Plasma vitamin A and E levels within the normal range.
13 gender and age‐matched people without CF (mean (SD) age 13.4 (6.3) years), 7 males, 6 females.
Interventions Intervention group: 8 x 1g capsules fish oil (4 capsules twice daily) containing 3.19 g EPA and 2.21 g DHA.
Control: olive oil placebo capsules flavoured to obtain a slight fish taste.
Outcomes Outcomes included in this review: 
 number of people experiencing adverse events; 
 number of deaths; 
 changes in haematological indices; 
 changes in plasma and erythrocyte levels of EPA and DHA and EPA/AA ratio.
Notes Significantly lower plasma n‐6 fatty acids (linoleic acid and AA) noted at baseline in participants with CF compared with the group who did not have CF.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised using a stratified randomised block design.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not discussed in paper.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Described as double blind ‐ while the capsules were not described as identical, it was stated that the placebo olive oil capsules were flavoured to obtain a slight fish taste which we agreed would be sufficient to blind participants.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals from the study were discussed with explanations (20 out of 25 randomised participants completed the study). Study included all participants in the data analysis, which was performed according to the ITT principle.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available for comparison, so unable to definitely eliminate selective reporting.
Other bias Low risk No additional bias identified.