Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;21(1):21.1.21. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2085

TABLE 5.

The percent of students by political affiliation who reported that they might find a particular subject offensive if a science instructor were to tell a joke about it.

Potentially Offensive Subject % of Democrat Students (n=546) % of Independent Students (n=266) % of Libertarian Students (n=97) % of Not Political Students (n=301) % of Republican Students (n=269)
Gender
 Women 74.2% 62.8% 51.5% 53.8% 46.8%
Race/ethnicity
 African Americans 73.3% 59.8% 53.6% 52.8% 49.1%
 Mexicans 73.8% 57.1% 52.6% 53.2% 49.8%
 Immigration 63.6% 49.6% 42.3% 41.9% 31.6%
Religion
 Christians 54.2% 52.6% 43.3% 47.5% 55.0%
 Jewish people 67.8% 54.5% 53.6% 49.5% 48.3%
 Muslims 75.5% 61.7% 53.6% 55.1% 47.6%
LGBTQ+ status
 Gay or lesbian people 71.1% 59.0% 52.6% 51.8% 45.0%
 Transgender people 73.4% 60.9% 53.6% 51.2% 45.4%
Disability status
 People with disabilities 73.3% 66.2% 54.6% 56.1% 56.5%
Age
 Old people 35.0% 29.7% 28.9% 27.6% 22.3%
Political affiliation
 Democrats 51.3% 36.1% 32.0% 32.6% 31.2%
 Republicans 33.9% 32.0% 35.1% 33.6% 45.0%*
Other
 Genitalia 39.0% 33.5% 32.0% 28.9% 32.0%
 Weight 57.1% 48.1% 46.4% 42.9% 36.8%
 Divorce 30.4% 28.2% 21.6% 27.9% 27.5%

Significant differences are bolded.

indicates that students of a particular political affiliation were significantly less likely than Democrat students to find a particular subject offensive if a college science instructor were to joke about it. (p<0.003).

We used the Bonferroni-adjusted p value to indicate significance (0.05/16) (p<0.003).

The binary logistic regression model tested for each potentially offensive subject was: (whether student perceived the subject as offensive [Y/N]) ~ political affiliation.