Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Oct 11;170:107097. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107097

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test in Fig. 3.

Comparison ITI range Mean diff 95% CI p-value

‘No puff’ vs ‘Control’ 3–10 −4.78 [−8.51, −1.05] 0.009
‘No puff’ vs ‘Control’ 10–15 −5.80 [−9.45, −2.15] 0.001
‘No puff’ vs ‘Control’ 15–30 −4.57 [−8.22, −0.92] 0.011
‘No puff’ vs ‘Control’ 30–60 −2.33 [−5.99, +1.32] 0.265
‘No puff’ vs ‘Control 60–80 +0.31 [−3.34, +3.97] 0.973
‘Strong puff’ vs ‘Control’ 3–10 +3.42 [−0.23, +7.08] 0.070
‘Strong puff’ vs ‘Control’ 10–15 +6.69 [+3.04, +10.35] 0.0001
‘Strong puff’ vs ‘Control’ 15–30 +6.07 [+2.42, +9.73] 0.0006
‘Strong puff’ vs ‘Control’ 30–60 +4.44 [+0.78, +8.10] 0.014
‘Strong puff’ vs ‘Control’ 60–80 +0.32 [−2.57, +4.74] 0.733