. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;88(5):389–401. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000487

Table 7.

Concurrent and prospective within-person associations between minority stress and substance use/problems controlling for general stress

		AUDIT		CUDIT
Model	Predictor	Any Alcohol Use (OR)^a	Alcohol Use Problems (RR)^b	Any Marijuana Use (OR)^a	Marijuana Use Problems (RR)^b
Model 1: Concurrent	Internalized stigma	1.21 [1.11, 1.32]	1.01 [.86, 1.18]	1.37 [.90, 2.10]	.97 [.85, 1.10]
Model 1: Concurrent	General Stress	1.01 [.99, 1.02]	.99 [.98, 1.01]	1.02 [.99, 1.03]	1.01 [.99, 1.02]
Model 1: Prospective	Internalized stigma	.78 [.56, 1.08]	1.00 [.84, 1.21]	.95 [.53, 1.70]	.95 [.83, 1.10]
Model 1: Prospective	General Stress	.99 [.90, 1.09]	1.00 [.98, 1.02]	1.01 [.98, 1.04]	.99 [.98, 1.01]
Model 2: Concurrent	Microaggressions	1.91 [1.64, 2.23]	1.02 [.88, 1.18]	1.16 [.93, 1.45]	1.01 [.95, 1.09]
Model 2: Concurrent	General Stress	1.01 [.96, 1.07]	1.00 [.98, 1.02]	1.01 [1.00, 1.02]	1.00 [.99, 1.02]
Model 2: Prospective	Microaggressions	1.05 [.48, 2.29]	.81 [.64, 1.04]	1.67 [.97, 2.94]	.93 [.79, 1.11]
Model 2: Prospective	General Stress	1.00 [.96, 1.03]	.99 [.97, 1.02]	1.00 [.93, 1.08]	.99 [.97, 1.01]
Model 3: Concurrent	Victimization	1.32 [1.12, 1.45]	1.27 [1.13, 1.43]	1.03 [.74, 1.42]	1.18 [1.05, 1.33]
Model 3: Concurrent	General Stress	1.04 [1.02, 1.07]	1.00 [.98, 1.02]	1.02 [.95, 1.09]	1.01 [.99, 1.03]
Model 3: Prospective	Victimization	1.14 [.43, 3.00]	.77 [.53, 1.14]	1.29 [.51, 3.29]	.83 [.68, 1.01]
Model 3: Prospective	General Stress	.99 [.91, 1.08]	.99 [.97, 1.02]	1.00 [.91, 1.09]	.99 [.97, 1.01]

All models were estimated controlling for linear change in substance use/problems over time, age at baseline, sexual identity, gender identity, race/ethnicity, and (for prospective associations) outcome at the previous wave. 95% confidence intervals are presented. Significant associations are in bold.