Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;10:6187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63035-2

Table 3.

General effect of training and age on cognitive performance.

Reaction time
Training effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 7.356 5.381 −5.493, 20.20 =0.432
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −29.33 14.90 −64.92, 6.260 =0.140
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −36.68 15.80 −74.42, 1.053 =0.060
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 7.065 3.858 −2.148, 16.28 =0.188
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −9.577 9.136 −31.39, 12.24 =0.649
Controls: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −16.64 9.825 −40.10, 6.817 =0.247
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 4.416 11.03 −21.91, 30.74 =0.970
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −24.36 28.50 −92.41, 43.70 =0.776
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −28.78 30.44 −101.4, 43.90 =0.718
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 7.545 4.939 −4.249, 19.34 =0.334
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −10.02 11.42 37.29, 17.26 =0.762
Statin users: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −17.56 12.28 −46.88, 11.76 =0.392
Age effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old −52.48 1.762 −56.42, −48.54 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old −52.77 2.834 −59.11, −46.43 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old −32.72 6.669 −47.65, −17.80 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old −34.56 2.989 −41.25, −27.88 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old −31.43 4.570 −41.66, −21.21 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old −20.22 10.58 −43.90, 3.462 =0.109
Working memory
Training effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 0.397 0.046 0.287, 0.507 <0.001**
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 0.700 0.127 0.396, 1.004 <0.001**
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 0.303 0.135 −0.019, 0.625 =0.072
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 0.715 0.064 0.562, 0.868 <0.001**
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 1.140 0.152 0.778, 1.502 <0.001**
Controls: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 0.425 0.163 0.036, 0.814 =0.027
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 0.365 0.094 0.140, 0.590 =0.001*
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 0.687 0.243 0.106, 1.268 =0.014
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 0.322 0.260 −0.298, 0.942 =0.517
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 0.644 0.082 0.448, 0.840 <0.001**
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 1.161 0.190 0.709, 1.613 <0.001**
Statin users: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 0.517 0.204 0.031, 1.003 =0.033
Age effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old −0.896 0.017 −0.933, −0.859 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old −0.578 0.066 −0.725, −0.431 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old −0.456 0.008 −0.474, −0.438 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old −0.724 0.028 −0.787, −0.661 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old −0.445 0.106 −0.683, −0.207 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old −0.250 0.013 −0.279, −0.221 <0.001**
Fluid intelligence
Training effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 −0.294 0.179 −0.722, 0.134 =0.273
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −1.057 0.496 −2.241, 0.127 =0.096
Controls: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −0.763 0.526 −2.019, 0.493 =0.379
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 −0.340 0.113 −0.610, −0.070 =0.008
Controls: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −0.985 0.268 −1.625, −0.345 =0.001*
Controls: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −0.645 0.288 −1.333, 0.043 =0.074
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 −0.408 0.367 −1.284, 0.468 =0.605
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −1.163 0.949 −3.428, 1.102 =0.526
Statin users: middle-aged, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −0.755 1.013 −3.174, 1.664 =0.839
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 2 −0.298 0.145 −0.644, 0.048 =0.115
Statin users: old, assessment 1 vs assessment 3 −1.103 0.335 −1.903, −0.303 =0.003
Statin users: old, assessment 2 vs assessment 3 −0.805 0.360 −1.665, 0.055 =0.074
Age effect MD SE CI 95% P
Controls: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old 0.402 0.058 0.272, 0.532 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old 0.356 0.060 0.221, 0.491 <0.001**
Controls: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old 0.474 0.006 0.461, 0.488 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 1, middle-aged vs old 0.458 0.099 0.237, 0.679 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 2, middle-aged vs old 0.568 0.097 0.350, 0.786 <0.001**
Statin users: assessment 3, middle-aged vs old 0.518 0.010 0.497, 0.539 <0.001**

Statistical test results from the analysis of training (repeated assessment) and age (middle-aged versus old) effects of controls and statin users in the three cognitive tests measuring reaction time (card game “Snap”), working memory (“Pairs matching test”) and reasoning abilities (“Fluid intelligence test”), adjusted for covariates (reaction time: sex, age, education, physical activity, sleep duration, alcohol intake, smoking status, angina, hypertension, cholesterol-lowering and anti-hypertension medication; working memory: sex, age, education, BMI, physical activity and hypertension; fluid intelligence: sex, age, education, physical activity, sleep duration, alcohol intake, heart attack, angina and cholesterol-lowering medication). Two-way ANOVAs and multiple comparison correction have been used for statistical analysis. MD = mean difference, SE = standard error, CI 95% = 95% confidence interval (min and max). *P < 0.003, **P < 0.001 for training effects and *P < 0.006, **P < 0.001 for age effects.