Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;10:6172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62607-6

Table 1.

Comparison of parameters analysed from optical coherence tomography angiography images.

Single group (G1) Denoising group (G2) Averaging group (G3) P-values among the 3 groups P-value of pairwise comparisons
G1 vs G2 G1 vs G3 G2 vs G3
VD, % 33.4 ± 8.3 29.7 ± 9.3 26.0 ± 12.1 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* 0.004*
VLD, % 11.9 ± 2.9 9.0 ± 3.0 7.7 ± 3.8 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* 0.03*
VDI 31.7 ± 5.1 37.6 ± 6.7 40.2 ± 9.9 0.001* <0.001* 0.002* 0.66
FD 1.5 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.3 <0.001* <0.001* 0.004* 0.61
CNR 1.2 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.3 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* 0.03*
CNV diagnostic scores 0.8 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.6 1.6 ± 0.4 <0.001* 0.008* <0.001* 0.12

Data are presented as the mean ± the standard deviation.

VD = vessel density; VLD = vessel length density; VDI = vessel diameter index; FD = fractal dimension; CNR = contrast-to-noise ratio; CNV = choroidal neovascularization.

Statistical comparisons were conducted among the three groups using an analysis of variance with repeated measures; subsequent pairwise comparisons were conducted with a Bonferroni test.

*Statistically significant P < 0.05.