Table 1.
Variable | DP | MHP | Pooled | Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | T | p | ||
Sample | 35 (38.9%) | 26 (28.9%) | 61 (100%) | B | 0.306 | |
Sex | Women | 16 (45.7%) | 15 (57.7%) | 31 (50.8%) | χ2 | 0.505 |
Men | 19 (54.3%) | 11 (42.3%) | 30 (49.2%) | |||
Age (years old) | 35–39 | 6 (17.1%) | 8 (30.8%) | 14 (23%) | t | 0.159 |
40–49 | 14 (40%) | 12 (46.2%) | 26 (42.6%) | |||
50–59 | 12 (34.3%) | 5 (19.2%) | 17 (27.9%) | |||
60–65 | 3 (8.6%) | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (6.6%) | |||
Educational level | Primary | 5 (14.3%) | 3 (11.5%) | 8 (13.1%) | ZU | 0.958 |
Secondary | 9 (25.7%) | 10 (38.5%) | 19 (31.1%) | |||
High school | 6 (17.1%) | 1 (3.8%) | 7 (11.5%) | |||
Vocational | 7 (20%) | 5 (19.2%) | 12 (19.7%) | |||
Bachelor | 7 (20%) | 5 (19.2%) | 12 (19.7%) | |||
Post-graduate | 1 (2.9%) | 2 (7.7%) | 3 (4.9%) | |||
Subjective socioeconomic status | Low | 2 (5.7%) | 2 (7.7%) | 4 (6.6%) | ZU | 0.191 |
Middle-low | 12 (34.3%) | 13 (50%) | 25 (41%) | |||
Middle-middle | 21 (60%) | 11 (42.3%) | 32 (52.4%) | |||
Civil status | Married | 25 (71.4%) | 13 (50%) | 38 (62.3%) | χ2 | 0.177 |
Single | 2 (5.7%) | 6 (23.1%) | 8 (13.1%) | |||
Divorced or separated | 3 (8.6%) | 5(19.2%) | 8 (13.1%) | |||
Cohabitating | 3 (8.6%) | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (6.6%) | |||
Willow | 2 (5.7%) | 1 (3.8%) | 3 (4.9%) | |||
Occupation | White collar | 15 a (42.9%) | 13 a (50%) | 28 (45.9%) | χ2 | 0.030 |
Housewife | 11 a (31.4%) | 12 a (46.2%) | 23 (37.7%) | |||
Blue collar | 8 a (22.9%) | 0 b (0%) | 8 (13.1%) | |||
Other * | 1 (5.7%) | 1 (3.8%) | 2 (3.3%) |
Note. n = absolute frequency and % = percentage. Samples: DP = dental patients with periodontitis, MHP = mental health patients with depressive symptomatology. Test: T = test statistic (B = binomial test, χ2 = Pearson’s chi-square test, t = Student’s t-test, ZU = Mann–Whitney U-test), p = probability value under the condition that the null hypothesis is true at a two-tailed test; a,b = each table superscript letter denotes a subset of categories whose row values do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level of significance applying Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. * The category of “other occupation” was excluded in the calculation of the test.