Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 21;8(1):20. doi: 10.3390/dj8010020

Table 7.

Goodness-of-fit comparison between nested models.

Difference between Models First Revision of Hypothetical Model (R1) Second Revision of Hypothetical Model (R2)
Δχ2 Δdf p Δχ2 Δdf p
UC−MW 0.148 2 0.929 0.007 2 0.997
UC−SW 6.967 6 0.324 1.472 4 0.832
UC−SC 24.241 7 0.001 2.219 5 0.818
UC−SR 26.292 10 0.003 5.095 7 0.648
UC−MR 33.827 13 0.001 13.294 10 0.208
MW−SW 6.819 4 0.146 1.465 2 0.481
MW−SC 24.093 5 <0.001 2.212 3 0.530
MW−SR 26.144 8 0.001 5.088 5 0.405
MW−MR 33.679 11 <0.001 13.287 8 0.102
SW−SC 17.274 1 <0.001 0.746 1 0.388
SW−SR 19.325 4 0.001 3.622 3 0.305
SW−MR 26.86 7 <0.001 11.821 6 0.066
SC−SR 2.051 3 0.562 2.876 2 0.237
SC−MR 9.585 6 0.143 11.075 5 0.050
SR−MR 7.535 3 0.057 8.199 3 0.042

Note. Nested models in constraints: UC = Unconstrained model, MW = model with constraints on the measurement weights, SW = model with constraints on the structural weights, SC = model with constrains on the structural covariances, SR = model with constrains on the structural residuals, and MR = model with constraints on measurement residuals. Statistic: Δχ2 = chi-square difference test statistic, Δdf = difference between degrees of freedom of the two models being compared, and p = probability value of chi-square difference statistic under null hypothesis of equality of goodness of fit between the two models being compared.