Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;117(14):7888–7896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000388117

Table 5.

Recruitment of hybrids and species from the two cohorts with most data

Hybrid/species Bred Did not breed Total Proportion bred
1987
 G. fortis 136 130 266 0.51
 Ff 10 7 17 0.59
 FS 5 2 7 0.71
 FfS 5 3 8 0.62
1991
G. fortis 204 428 632 0.32
 Ff 16 24 40 0.40
 FS 3 8 11 0.27
 FfS 2 1 3 0.67
G. scandens 30 88 118 0.25
 SF 2 2 4 0.50

Symbols of the hybrids as in Tables 1 and 2, except that FfS combines all trihybrids with an assignment probability greater to G. fortis than to G. scandens. Other hybrid categories were not present or represented by single individuals.