Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;117(14):7633–7644. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916498117

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Analysis of parental and metastatic CCA cell surface glycosylation. (A) Morphological and phenotypic characterization of CCA cells. (B) Image capture of live cell microscopy videos of KKU-213A and KKU-213AL5 growth at the beginning of a 24-h incubation at 37 °C. Per given cell, displacement was tracked frame by frame. Colored lines (Right) indicate the direction and extent of each cell’s movement. (Scale bars, 50 μm.) (C) Quantitative changes in N-glycan abundances between parental and metastatic CCA cells based on their compositional features. Groups include high mannose (HM), paucimannose (PM), fucosylated (Fuc), sialylated (Sia), and nondecorated (non-Fuc and non-Sia). Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (D) Structures of high-mannose N-glycans found in mammalian cells, represented using symbol nomenclature. (E) Abundances of extended high-mannose glycan structures (Man 7 to Man 9) in parental and metastatic CCA cells. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (F) Fold change of glycosylation-related gene expression (normalized to parental) measured by qRT-PCR. Data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (G) Intracellular binding of anti-MAN1A1 in parental and metastatic CCA cells, detected by flow cytometry. FMO, fluorescence minus one.