Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;40:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.06.003

Table 6.

Multinomial logistic regression (base case: ΔWTP = 0 & ΔCons = 0).

Variables Conditions
ΔWTP > 0 & ΔCons = 0 ΔWTP < 0 & ΔCons = 0 ΔWTP = 0 & ΔCons < 0 ΔWTP > 0 & ΔCons < 0 ΔWTP < 0 & ΔCons < 0
Fear in 2013
Fear1: I would not eat any other new food 0.045 0.244 0.228 0.083 0.248
Fear2: Eating AI infected chicken will immediately kill me 0.417 0.423 1.005⁎⁎⁎ 1.042⁎⁎⁎ 0.892⁎⁎⁎
Fear3: AI risk cannot easily be controlled 0.693 0.025 − 0.135 − 0.156 − 0.144
Fear4: AI risk is increasing − 0.349 − 0.263 0.451⁎⁎ 0.471⁎⁎⁎ 0.537⁎⁎⁎
Fear5: AI can kill many people 0.241 − 0.100 0.012 0.039 − 0.206
Fear6: AI is contagious among humans − 0.535 − 0.529 0.159 0.277 0.390⁎⁎
Fear7: I am personally at risk for AI − 0.683 0.327 − 0.123 0.044 − 0.120



Trust in 2013
Trust1: I trust ministry of agriculture 1.712⁎⁎ 0.622 0.583⁎⁎ 0.491⁎⁎ 0.394
Trust2: I trust ministry of health − 1.706⁎⁎ − 0.259 − 0.404 − 0.213 − 0.066
Trust3: I trust research institutes 0.882 − 0.029 0.421 0.074 0.010
Trust4: I trust local government − 0.453 − 0.754⁎⁎ − 0.263 − 0.131 − 0.290
Trust5: I trust TV news 0.251 0.719 − 0.103 0.292 0.523
Trust6: I trust network news 0.175 − 0.190 0.230 0.097 − 0.054
Trust7: I trust scholars − 0.208 0.146 − 0.009 − 0.224 0.037
Trust8: I trust friends and relatives 0.040 − 0.239 0.034 0.131 0.142
Trust9: I trust chicken sales staff − 0.176 0.160 0.058 − 0.112 − 0.070



High incidence city dummy
Nanjing − 0.029 2.781⁎⁎ 2.767⁎⁎⁎ 1.320⁎⁎ 2.287⁎⁎⁎
Changzhou − 0.949 2.703⁎⁎ 1.894⁎⁎ 0.484 1.725⁎⁎
Zhengjiang − 17.469 2.666 0.754 0.800 1.303
Lianyungang − 0.701 3.605⁎⁎⁎ 2.451⁎⁎⁎ 0.025 1.878⁎⁎



Low incidence city dummy
Linyi 0.249 3.845⁎⁎⁎ 2.243⁎⁎⁎ − 0.693 2.655⁎⁎⁎
Zaozhuang − 0.030 − 12.782 0.228 0.343 1.021



New stimulus dummy in 2013
Risk-perception reducing information 0.654 1.127 1.652⁎⁎⁎ 1.270⁎⁎⁎ 1.018⁎⁎
Risk-perception elevating information 0.865 0.662 1.335⁎⁎⁎ 1.085⁎⁎ 0.045



Knowledge in 2013
Cognitive level about AI − 0.149 − 0.286 − 0.381⁎⁎ − 0.193 − 0.042



Lagged WTP
WTP in 2012 − 0.131⁎⁎⁎ 0.118⁎⁎⁎ − 0.036 − 0.004 0.098⁎⁎⁎



Lagged consumption
CONS in 2012 − 0.375 0.501 0.758⁎⁎ 0.473 0.458



Gender
Male 0.042 − 0.670 0.708 0.025 − 0.183



Age in 2013
Age − 0.046 − 0.058⁎⁎ − 0.001 − 0.024 − 0.021



Family type in 2013
Total household population 0.051 − 0.123 − 0.322⁎⁎ − 0.051 0.131
The proportion of children 0.325 0.053 2.050 0.820 1.795
The proportion of elderly − 0.104 − 0.137 0.111 0.403 0.267



Education dummy in 2013
High school − 0.999 − 1.133 0.823 − 0.056 0.149
Undergraduate − 0.769 − 0.516 − 0.210 0.102 0.066
Postgraduate − 0.653 − 1.126 − 1.188 − 0.931 − 1.985⁎⁎



Income dummy in 2013
1501 ~ 3000 RMB 16.455 0.235 0.575 0.192 0.506
3001 ~ 4500 RMB 16.205 − 0.133 0.904 0.621 1.044
4501 ~ 6000 RMB 15.587 − 1.468 0.627 − 0.014 − 0.061
6001 ~ 7500 RMB 16.344 − 16.075 2.172 1.459 2.194
> 7500 RMB 16.133 − 0.170 1.034 0.311 0.795
Constant − 12.196 − 6.054 − 7.624 − 5.906⁎⁎⁎ − 13.94⁎⁎⁎
Observation 802
Adj. R2 0.343

Note: Asterisk (*), double asterisk (**) and triple asterisk (***) denote variables significant at the 10%, 5% and 1% significance levels respectively.