Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 11:135–154. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-375156-0.00010-2

Table 10.1.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Diagnostic Methods

Diagnostic Method Advantages Disadvantages/Problems
Virus isolation Produces further material for study of agent Slow, time-consuming, can be difficult and expensive
Usually highly sensitive Selection of cell type, etc., may be critical
“Open-minded” Useless for non-viable virus or for non-cultivable agents
Direct observation by electron microscopy Rapid Relatively insensitive
Detects viruses that cannot be grown in culture Cumbersome for large numbers of samples
Detects non-viable virus Limited to a few infections
“Open-minded”
Serological identification of virus or antigen, for example, EIA Rapid and sensitive Not applicable to all viruses
Provides information on serotypes Interpretation may be difficult
Readily available, often as diagnostic kits Not as sensitive as PCR
Targeted to a specific agent
Detection of viral genomes by PCR Rapid, very sensitive High sensitivity may lead to detection of non-relevant co-infections
Potentially applicable to all viruses incl. non-cultivable Risk of DNA contamination
Reagents (primers) for additional viruses easily made Needs good quality control
Good quantitation of load Targeted to a specific agent
Can be multiplexed
Antibody seroconversion (acute and convalescent sera) Useful if appropriate samples for direct detection cannot be obtained, or to exclude a particular infection retrospectively Slow, late (retrospective)
Interpretation may be difficult
Targeted to a specific agent
IgM serology Rapid False positives may occur
Targeted to a specific agent