Table 2.
Anthropometric measures according to quintiles (Q) of fat quality indices
| Variable | BMI(Kg/m2) | WC (cm) | WHtR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | P1 | P2 | Mean ± SD | P1 | P2 | Mean ± SD | P1 | P2 | |
| PSR | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 25.2 ± 5.2 | 81.6 ± 10.2 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 22.0 ± 5.2 | 72.7 ± 13.5 | 0.46 ± 0.08 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 22.5 ± 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 75.7 ± 7.4 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Q4 (56) | 24.5 ± 4.1 | 80.0 ± 9.2 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 23.5 ± 4.2 | 77.9 ± 9.2 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| ∑ω-3/∑ω-6 | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 21.6 ± 4.4 | 72.8 ± 9.9 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 23.9 ± 4.6 | 79.3 ± 10.4 | 0.50 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 24.3 ± 4.9 | 0.09 | 0.057 | 78.4 ± 10.0 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.058 |
| Q4 (56) | 25.4 ± 4.2 | 83.1 ± 8.8 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 22.5 ± 4.4 | 74.3 ± 10.3 | 0.47 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| h/H | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 25.5 ± 5.5 | 81.4 ± 12.4 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| 2 (56) | 21.9 ± 4.1 | 73.0 ± 8.9 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 24.1 ± 4.6 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 78.9 ± 11.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| Q4 (56) | 23.4 ± 4.2 | 77.3 ± 8.6 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 22.8 ± 3/9 | 77.4 ± 9.5 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| AI | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 22.8 ± 4.1 | 76.8 ± 9.9 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 24.2 ± 4.4 | 79.2 ± 8.4 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 23.5 ± 3.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 78.1 ± 7.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Q4 (56) | 21.7 ± 4.9 | 71.6 ± 12.4 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 25.4 ± 5.3 | 82.2 ± 10.7 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| TI | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 22.4 ± 3.1 | 74.7 ± 7.1 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 24.5 ± 4.8 | 80.5 ± 10.7 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 22.9 ± 3.9 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 75.8 ± 9.0 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| Q4 (56) | 22.3 ± 4.9 | 75.1 ± 12.4 | 0.47 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 25.5 ± 5.3 | 82.0 ± 10.8 | 0.51 ± 0.08 | ||||||
| LI | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 22.9 ± 3.8 | 77.6 ± 9.3 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 23.9 ± 4.3 | 77.4 ± 9.2 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 23.2 ± 4.5 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 77.1 ± 9.3 | 0.2 | 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.02 |
| Q4 (56) | 21.9 ± 4.7 | 73.1 ± 12.4 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 26.0 ± 5.1 | 82.7 ± 10.1 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| TF | |||||||||
| Q1 (55) | 24.0 ± 5.4 | 79.8 ± 12.7 | 0.49 ± 0.08 | ||||||
| Q2 (56) | 23.7 ± 4.2 | 79.0 ± 9.1 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | ||||||
| Q3 (55) | 23.3 ± 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 77.2 ± 8.2 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.06 |
| Q4 (56) | 22.2 ± 3.9 | 73.5 ± 9.6 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | ||||||
| Q5 (55) | 24.4 ± 5.3 | 78.4 ± 11.5 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | ||||||
P for trend (P1; unadjusted model test of trend using ANOVA with contrast function, P2; Significance level of test for trend association in adjusted linear regression model with adjustment for age (continuous); asset score (continuous); physical activity level (natural log transformed); dietary energy/kcal (continuous); woman education (categorical); husband education (categorical); occupation woman (categorical); occupation husband (categorical); marital status (categorical). In all multiple regression models, dummy variables were created for categorical covariates. To analyze the linear trends in the adjusted models, the median values of PSR, ∑ω-3/∑ω-6, h/H, AI, TI, LI and TF were imputed for each quintile and the new variables were treated as continuous variables in linear regression model. TF; percentage of energy obtained from dietary fat. P < 0·05 was considered statistically significant. WC Waist circumference, BMI Body Mass Index, WHtR Waist to Height Ratio, ANOVA One-Way Analysis of Variance, PSR polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids ratio, ∑ω-3/∑ω-6; omega-3 to omega-6 fatty acids ratio, h/H hypo and hypercholesterolemic fatty acids ratio, AI Atherogenicity index, TI Thrombogenic index, LI Dietary lipophilic index, TF Percentage of energy from total fat