Clarity of content/concepts of the scale |
The concepts of the scale were clear to me |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
16 (47.1) |
17 (50.0) |
The concepts were compatible with the language used in practice |
1 (2.9) |
1 (2.9) |
13 (38.2) |
19 (55.9) |
The way in which the observations are described is free of values and judgement |
0 (0) |
6 (17.6) |
11 (32.4) |
17 (50.0) |
There was a clear difference between the possible answers |
0 (0) |
5 (14.7) |
15 (44.1) |
14 (41.2) |
Nurses’ perception of their competence to fill out the scale |
I have sufficient knowledge from my training/experience to evaluate the observations on the scale |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
14 (41.2) |
20 (58.8) |
I could quickly make a choice between the possible answers |
0 (0) |
4 (11.8) |
17 (50.0) |
13 (38.2) |
I requested help from others because it was not clear to me what was being asked |
11 (32.4) |
12 (35.3) |
7 (20.6) |
4 (11.8) |
The instructions on the form helped me in choosing the answers |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
15 (44.1) |
18 (52.9) |
Relevance/feasibility of the scale |
I found it a handy instrument to spot delirium symptoms |
0 (0) |
6 (17.6) |
21 (61.8) |
7 (20.6) |
This instrument offered added value to my practice of nursing |
0 (0) |
14 (41.2) |
12 (35.3) |
8 (23.5) |
Clarity of single ICDSC items |
Item 1 (altered level of consciousness) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
13 (38.2) |
21 (61.8) |
Item 2 (inattention) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
12 (25.8) |
22 (64.7) |
Item 3 (disorientation) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
10 (29.4) |
23 (67.6) |
Item 4 (hallucination, delusion, psychosis) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
15 (44.1) |
18 (52.9) |
Item 5 (psychomotor agitation or retardation) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
13 (38.2) |
20 (58.8) |
Item 6 (inappropriate speech or mood) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
4 (11.8) |
14 (41.2) |
16 (47.1) |
Item 7 (sleep/wake cycle disturbance) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
1 (2.9) |
14 (41.2) |
19 (55.9) |
Item 8 (symptom fluctuation) is clear to me |
0 (0) |
4 (11.8) |
13 (38.2) |
17 (50.0) |