Table 3.
Category (Subcategory) | G1 N |
G2 N |
G3 N |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theme 1: Maternal risk | |||||
1. Over-nutrition and lack of exercise | |||||
1.1. | Lack of exercise and strength to give birth | 2 | 1 | ||
1.2. | Lack of exercise and overweight | 5 | |||
2. Older maternal age of giving birth | |||||
2.1. | A trend of giving birth at an older age would increase medical indications of CS | 2 | |||
3. Previous CS | |||||
3.1. | Previous CS is a valid medical reason for choosing CS | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
3.2. | Shortage of obstetricians who assist vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC) | 1 | |||
3.3. | Few mothers prefer to try VBAC because of its risks | 1 | |||
4. Increased previous abortion | |||||
4.1. | Increased number of abortion leads anomaly of placenta | 1 | |||
Theme 2: Institutional factor | |||||
5. Influence of antenatal screening | |||||
5.1. | Improvement of antenatal screening detects more high-risk women indicated for CS | 1 | |||
5.2. | Introduction of ultrasonography detects more abnormality | 1 | |||
6. Missed severe pregnancy complications | |||||
6.1. | Pregnancy complications detection missed, due to misunderstanding and lack of knowledge among mothers and family | 1 | |||
7. Improvement of operative care | |||||
7.1. | Improvement of operative care replaced instrumental delivery (forceps or vacuum) to CS in modern Vietnam. | 1 |
G 1: pregnant women who wished CS (N = 10), G 2: pregnant women who did not wish CS (N = 19), G 3: healthcare professionals (N = 19), N: Number of participants mentioned about subcategory.