Table 1.
Advantages and disadvantages of selected on-site wastewater treatment systems
| Sanitation system | Water requirements | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple pit latrine | Dry | Inexpensive, limited expertise needed for construction | Significant fly and odor problems, concerns by users over safety |
| Pour flush latrine | Wet, with low-volume water use | Low-volume water use, fly and odor problem controlled, convenient for users, easily upgraded | Increased cost compared to pit latrine, reliable water supply needed |
| Composting latrine | Dry | Humus produced as fertilizer/soil conditioner | Requires expertise to operate, sludge requires careful handling, some systems require urine separation, ash and vegetable matter must be added regularly |
| Urine separation | Dry, with urine collected separately | Provides humus used for fertilizer, urine can be used as fertilizer, low-cost systems available, reduces hydraulic load | Desludging requires careful handling, pathogens may not be inactivated in sludge pile, user education required, significant time spent in operation and maintenance |
| Septic tank | Wet, with high-volume water use | Convenient, limited fly and odor problems, wastes removed rapidly | High cost; in-house piped water generally required, large space requirement, regular desludging required, permeable soil required |
Source: Franceys R, Pickford J, and Reed R (1992) A Guide to the development of on-site sanitation. Geneva: WHO.