Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 3:256–263. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00046-5

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of selected on-site wastewater treatment systems

Sanitation system Water requirements Advantages Disadvantages
Simple pit latrine Dry Inexpensive, limited expertise needed for construction Significant fly and odor problems, concerns by users over safety
Pour flush latrine Wet, with low-volume water use Low-volume water use, fly and odor problem controlled, convenient for users, easily upgraded Increased cost compared to pit latrine, reliable water supply needed
Composting latrine Dry Humus produced as fertilizer/soil conditioner Requires expertise to operate, sludge requires careful handling, some systems require urine separation, ash and vegetable matter must be added regularly
Urine separation Dry, with urine collected separately Provides humus used for fertilizer, urine can be used as fertilizer, low-cost systems available, reduces hydraulic load Desludging requires careful handling, pathogens may not be inactivated in sludge pile, user education required, significant time spent in operation and maintenance
Septic tank Wet, with high-volume water use Convenient, limited fly and odor problems, wastes removed rapidly High cost; in-house piped water generally required, large space requirement, regular desludging required, permeable soil required

Source: Franceys R, Pickford J, and Reed R (1992) A Guide to the development of on-site sanitation. Geneva: WHO.