Skip to main content
. 2009 May 15:491–555. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-07271-0.50013-6

Table 11.2.

Mediators associated with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Nature of associationa
Cytokines Active disease/relapse (reference*) Remission/suppression (reference*) Disease modulated by antibody or inhibitors (reference)*
IL-1 + *1 Yes *22

IL-2 + 2,3 NRb

IL-3 + 4 NR

IL-4 +

IL-6 + 1 NR

IL-10 + *1,5

IL-12 + 5 Yes 12

IL-13 + 13

IL-18 + 6 Yes 14

IFN-γ + 1,3 +c Yesd 3,15

TNF-α + 1,5,7 Yes 16

LT-α + 8 Yes 8

TGF-β + 17,18

IFN-α ? + 19 (directly inhibited EAE)

Chemokinesd
MCP-1 + 9 Yes 20,21

MIP-1α + 9,10 Yes 10,20,21

MIP-1β + 9 NR

RANTES + 9 No 20,21

IP-10 + 9 Yes 20

C10 + 11 NR

MIP-2 10,20

TCA-3 +e 9

References: 1 = Okuda et al (1995); 2 = Litzenburger et al (1998); 3 = Owens et al (1994); 4 = Campbell et al (1998); 5 = Issazadeh et al (1995); 6 = Jander and Stoll (1998); 8 = Hjelstrom et al (1998); 9 = Stalder et al (1998); 10 = Karpus (1995); 11 = Bruce et al (1996); 12 = Leonard et al (1995); 13 = Cash et al (1994); 14 = Wildbaum et al (1998); 15 = Popko et al (1997); 16 = Selmaj and Raine (1995); 17 = Johns and Sriram (1993); 18 = Racke et al (1991); 19 = Billian et al (1988); 20 = Ransohoff (1999); 21 = Youssef et al (1998); 22 = Martin and Near (1995).

a

References cited are as far as possible those that identified the mediators in question in the CNS, at or near sites of pathology, or reviews that summarize those data.

b

NR: No reports.

c

The viewpoint that IFN-γ suppresses experimental allergic encephalomyelitis is not consistent with recent data, but was a logical interpretation of antibody and knockout experiments in their time.

d

The literature on this topic is broad, so only a few reviews have been cited.

e

Association in this case was on the basis of expression by encephalitogenic T cells.

Reproduced fromT. Owens et al (2001).

© 2006