Table 9.2.
Summary of pre-treatment approaches prior to PCR to distinguish between infectious and non-infectious viruses
| Pre-treatment prior to PCR | Rationale | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteinase and RNase treatment | The capsid of infectious particles is resistant to proteinase digestion and thus protects the genome against RNases. | Usable for non-cultivable viruses Practical and easy pre-treatment |
Works only in defined conditions (inactivation at 72 °C or by hypochlorite) | Nuanualsuwan and Clivei; 2002; Nuanualsuwan and Cliver, 2003 |
| Antibody capture of the virus | The capsid of inactivated virus might alter its antigenic properties (changes in protein conformation) thus resulting in the virus losing the ability of being recognised by specific antibodies. | Isolation of infectious viruses from large volume samples (e.g., water) | Detection depends on antigenic properties of viral capsid | Gilpatrick et al., 2000, Schwab et al., 1996 |
| Usable for non-cultivable viruses | Effective only if the antigenic properties of the viral capsid are defined | |||
| Attachment of virus to cell monolayer | The capsid of inactivated viruses changes its antigenic properties (changes in protein conformation) and thus the virus is unable to attach to receptors of the monolayer. | Able to distinguish between infectious and non-infectious viruses (in defined conditions) | Applicable only for cell-cultivable viruses | Li et al., 2011, Nuanualsuwan and Cliver, 2003 |
| Intercalating dyes treatment (Propidium monoazid; PMA) | The PMA penetrates the damaged or compromised capsid of the inactivated virus and binds covalently to the genome upon exposure to visible light, which prevents detection of the genome using PCR. | Usable for non-cultivable viruses | Works only in defined conditions (inactivation at 72 and 37 °C or by hypochlorite) | Fittipaldi et al., 2010, Parshionikar et al., 2010 |