Table 2.
Changes in energy and nutrient contents of ‘New’ compared to ‘Old’ DCL products (large symbol), in relation to energy and nutrient criteria changes between 2006 or 2007 and 2011 (1st smaller symbol), and between 2006 or 2007 and 2015 (2nd smaller symbol).
Energy | Saturated fat | Trans fat | Added sugar | Sodium | Fibre | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bread2 | ↑a | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓0↓ | ↓0↓ | 00↓ |
Cheese1 | ↑a | ↑↑↓ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Hard cheeses1 | ↑a | ↑↑↓ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓0↓ | 000 |
Soft cheeses1 | ↑a | 0↑↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Margarines1 | 0 a | 0↓↑ | 0↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 000 |
Processed fruit & vegetables1 | 0 a | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↑↑↑ | 0↓↓ |
Processed fruit1 | 0 a | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↑↑ | 0↓↓ |
Processed vegetables1 | ↓a | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↑↑↑ | 0↓↓ |
Milk-based drinks1 | 0 a | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓00 | 000 |
Milk-based desserts1 | 0 a | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 000 | ↑00 |
Processed meat & meat substitutes2 | ↑a | 00↑ | ↓↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Processed meat2 | 0 a | 00↑ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Meat substitutes2 | ↑a | 00↑ | ↓↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Processed fish2 | 0 a | 0↑↓ | 0↓↓ | 000 | ↑0↓ | 000 |
Processed potatoes3 | 0 a | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 000 | ↓↓↓ | ↓0↓ |
Soups1 | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | ↑00 |
Emulsion sauces1 | 0↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↑↑ | 0↓↓ | ↑00 |
Sauces on water basis2 | ↓0↑ | 0↓↑ | 0↓↑ | ↓0↓ | 00↓ | 000 |
Meal sauces1 | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↑00 |
Bread toppings2 | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 000 |
Bread salads2 | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | 000 |
Snacks2 | 0↓↓ | ↓0↓ | ↓0↓ | 000 | ↓00 | 000 |
Cookie/ muesli bar2 | 0↓↓ | 00↓ | ↓0↓ | 000 | 000 | ↑00 |
Ice cream/ sorbet2 | 0↓↓ | 00↓ | ↓0↓ | ↑00 | ↓00 | ↓00 |
Candy3 | ↑↓↓ | 00↓ | 00↓ | 000 | 000 | 000 |
Soft drinks1 | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0 ↓↓ | ↓↓↓ | 000 |
Fruit juices1 | ↓↓↓ | ↑↓↓ | 0↓↓ | 0↓↓ | ↓00 | ↑↓↓ |
↓ The average nutrient content has significantly reduced between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ (p<0.05).
↑ The average nutrient content has significantly increased between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ (p<0.05) 0 The average nutrient content did not change significantly between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ (p<0.05).
↓ Choices nutrient criterion was tightened in 2011 (1st symbol) or 2015 (2nd symbol), compared to criterion valid in ‘Old’ (i.e. 2006 or 2007 criteria).
↑ Choices nutrient criterion was less strict in 2011 (1st symbol) or 2015 (2nd symbol), compared to criterion valid in ‘Old’ (i.e. 2006 or 2007 criteria).
0 No criterion change from ‘Old’ (i.e. 2006 or 2007 criteria) to 2011 (1st symbol) or 2015 (2nd symbol).
1 ‘Old’ (2006/07) is compared to ‘New’ (2016).
2 ‘Old’ (2007/08) is compared to ‘New’ (2016).
3 ‘Old’ (2008/09) is compared to ‘New’ (2016).
DCL: Dutch Choices Logoa No nutrient criteria were developed for this product category.
a No nutrient criteria were developed for this product category.