Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;158(5):1300–1312.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.020

Table 3.

MR Estimates Between Circulating Levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3 and Risk of Colorectal Cancer (n = 52,865 Colorectal Cancer Cases and n = 46,287 Controls)

MR
Likelihood-based approach
Weighted median approach
MR-Egger test
OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment OR (95% CI) per 1-SD increment
IGF1
Colorectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.08 (1.03–1.12) 1.12 (1.04–1.20) 1.11 (0.98–1.27)
 Men 1.11 (1.05–1.17) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 1.18 (1.00–1.38)
 Women 1.05 (0.99–1.11) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 1.06 (0.89–1.25)
Colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.06 (1.01–1.11) 1.12 (1.03–1.23) 1.14 (0.98–1.32)
Proximal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.08 (0.97–1.21) 1.02 (0.84–1.23)
Distal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.07 (1.00–1.14) 1.10 (0.98–1.23) 1.26 (1.05–1.50)
Rectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.06 (1.00–1.14) 1.01 (0.90–1.13) 1.09 (0.91–1.30)
IGFBP3
Colorectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.06–1.18) 1.14 (1.07–1.20) 1.18 (1.07–1.31)
 Men 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 1.13 (1.04–1.22) 1.14 (0.98–1.34)
 Women 1.12 (1.04–1.21) 1.13 (1.04–1.22) 1.25 (1.18–1.32)
Colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.11 (1.04–1.19) 1.13 (1.05–1.21) 1.27 (1.16–1.38)
Proximal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.03–1.22) 1.12 (1.02–1.23) 1.25 (1.21–1.29)
Distal colon cancer
 Both sexes 1.10 (1.01–1.20) 1.13 (1.03–1.24) 1.29 (1.01–1.65)
Rectal cancer
 Both sexes 1.12 (1.04–1.22) 1.14 (1.05–1.25) 1.18 (1.01–1.39)