Table 3.

SEM results (H1a, H1b, and H2).

	Model 1: Effect of disruption absorption (H1a)			Model 2:Effect of recoverability (H1b)			Model 3: Relative effects of disruption absorption and recoverability (H2)
	Disruption absorption	Recoverability	Operational efficiency	Disruption absorption	Recoverability	Operational efficiency	Disruption absorption	Recoverability	Operational efficiency
Control paths:
Slack resource	.04(.52)	.03(.52)	.03(.38)	.04(.53)	.03(.51)	.02(.37)	.04(.52)	.03(.51)	.02(.33)
Disruption orientation	.08(1.13)	.15(2.15) *	-.04(-.61)	.08(1.10)	.15(2.18) *	-.08(-1.14)	.08(1.13)	.15(2.17) *	-.08(-1.12)
Collaborative resilience-building effort	.23(3.37) ***	.10(1.42)	-.11(-1.50)	.23(3.38) ***	.10(1.42)	-.06(-.94)	.23(3.37) ***	.10(1.42)	-.09(-1.31)
Firm size	.19(2.45) *	.20(2.61) **	-.18(-2.14) *	.19(2.45) *	.20(2.61) **	-.19(-2.34) *	.19(2.45) *	.20(2.61) **	-.20(-2.49) *
Firm age	-.03(-.35)	.02(.31)	.03(.39)	-.03(-.35)	.02(.31)	.01(.17)	-.03(-.35)	.02(.31)	.02(.25)
Firm industry (services = 1)	.03(.46)	-.03(-.46)	.10(1.57)	.03(.46)	-.03(-.46)	.12(1.93)	.03(.46)	-.03(0.46)	.11(1.83)
Operational disruption			-.12(-1.99) *			-.11(-1.81)			-.11(-1.79)
Hypothesized paths:
Disruption absorption			.33(4.44) ***						.16(1.85)
Recoverability						.38(5.23) ***			.29(3.45) ***

Model fit indices:
χ2/DF	532.57/368 = 1.45	523.99/368 = 1.42	520.19/367 = 1.42
RMSEA	.04	.04	.04
NNFI	.96	.96	.96
CFI	.96	.97	.97
SRMR	.05	.04	.04

Notes: Standardized coefficients (t-values) are reported in the table. *p < .05 (2-tailed), **p < .01 (2-tailed), ***p < .001(2-tailed).