Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 13;53(3):396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.04.004

Table 1.

ARIMA model comparison.

Model ar1 ar2 ar3 AIC AICc BIC ME RMSE MAE MPE MAPE MASE ACF1
ARIMA(1,2,0)10 Registered cases 0.3694 680.41 680.7 683.98 17.84 514.74 324.46 4.26 6.25 0.1403 0.0113
s.e. 0.1575
ARIMA(3,2,0)10 Recovered cases −1.14 −0.74 −0.48 597.18 598.21 604.32 80.80 186.85 112.27 10.57 15.60 0.3293 −0.081
s.e. 0.1296 0.1826 0.1357

∗ar1,ar2,….arn are model coefficients; s.e.: standard errors; AIC: Akaike information criteria; AICc: Second order Akaike information criteria; BIC: Bayesian Information criterion; ME: Margin of error; RMSE: Root mean square error of fitted model; MAE: Mean absolute error; MPE: Mean posterior estimate; MAPE: Median absolute prediction error; MASE: Mean absolute scaled error; ACF: Aberrant crypt foci.