Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;24(2):163–190. doi: 10.1177/1088868319891310

Table 2.

Studies Included in Meta-Analysis on SDS-Cognitions Assessed With Likert-type-Scale Questionnaires.

Study Sample N Age Education Gender equality country Ethnicity Measure Questionnaire Conceptualization Sexual behavior Year Publication Design
Ali-Faisal (2014) ♂♀ 403 25 H 0.8015 M Q 1 MO MO 2014 D C
Alves et al. (2008) 140 21 H 0.8230 LH Q 2, 3 S, MO MO 2008 J C
168 21 H 0.8230 LH Q 2, 3 S, MO MO 2008 J C
Askun & Ataca (2007) ♂♀ 540 21 H 0.6540 Q 1 MO MO 2007 J C
Balanko (2002) 21 20 H 0.8385 M Q 2 MO MO 2002 D O
Bareket et al. (2018) 108 28 0.8115 O Q O AT CS 2018 J WS
Bay-Cheng & Zucker (2007) 342 19 H 0.7645 W Q 2 MO MO 2007 J C
Bliss (2013) 71 19 H 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2013 D C
82 19 H 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2013 D C
Caron et al. (1993) 131 18 H 0.7645 Q 1 MO MO 1993 J C
199 18 H 0.7645 Q 1 MO MO 1993 J C
Clarke et al. (2015) 140 29 H 0.8110 Q 2 MO MO 2015 J C
Danube et al. (2016) 360 25 0.7645 M Q 1 MO MO 2016 J O
Diéguez et al. (2003) 2246 20 H 0.8330 LH Q 2 MO MO 2003 J C
3,368 20 H 0.8330 LH Q 2 MO MO 2003 J C
Doan (2006) 87 30 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2006 D C
Eaton & Matamala (2014) 263 20 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2014 J C
292 20 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2014 J C
Emmerink, Vanwesenbeeck, et al. (2016) 210 18 M 0.8465 M Q 4 AT MO 2016 J C
255 18 M 0.8465 M Q 4 AT MO 2016 J C
Emmerink, Van den Eijnden, et al. (2016) 126 21 M 0.8465 W Q 4 AT MO 2016 J C
267 21 M 0.8465 W Q 4 AT MO 2016 J C
Emmerink et al. (2017) 340 20 M 0.8465 W Q 4 AT MO 2017 J L
478 20 M 0.8465 W Q 4 AT MO 2017 J L
Eriksson & Humphreys (2014) 39 19 H 0.8385 Q 1 MO MO 2014 J C
184 19 H 0.8385 Q 1 MO MO 2014 J C
Glass (1972) 69 12–18 0.7645 Q 5 AT MO 1972 J WS
211 12–18 0.7645 Q 5 AT MO 1972 J WS
Greene & Faulkner (2005) 608 21 M 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2005 J C
608 21 M 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2005 J C
Hanassab & Tidwell (1993) ♀US 81 23 M 0.7645 A Q O S, AT PSU, MO 1993 J C
♀Iran 193 21 0.5610 A Q O S, AT PSU, MO 1985 J C
Hearn (2001) ♂♀ 96 21 M 0.7645 B Q 1 MO MO 2001 D C
Hong (2013) ♂♀ 165 52 H 0.7645 M Q 1 MO MO 2013 D C
Isarabhakdi (1999) 577 18 0.6505 EA Q 5 AT MO 1999 J WS
517 18 0.6505 EA Q 5 AT MO 1999 J WS
Javier (2018) 197 19–25 H 0.7645 O Q 2 MO MO 2018 D C
Jozkowski & Ekbia (2015) ♂♀ 141 19–25 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2015 J O
Kettrey (2016) 3,436 19–25 H 0.7645 M Q O AT CS 2016 J WS
7,641 19–25 H 0.7645 M Q O AT CS 2016 J WS
Kistler (2011) >25 163 >25 M 0.7645 W Q 2 MO MO 2011 D C
19–25 301 19–25 M 0.7645 W Q 2 MO MO 2011 D C
Lefkowitz et al. (2014) 208 18 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2014 J C
226 18 H 0.7645 M Q 2 MO MO 2014 J C
Levin (2010) 144 19 H 0.7645 M Q O S MO 2010 D C
191 19 H 0.7645 M Q O S MO 2010 D C
Milhausen & Herold (2001) 167 21 0.8385 Q 3, O S, AT ACT, MO 2001 J C
246 21 0.8385 Q 3, O S, AT ACT, MO 2001 J C
Miller (2012) ♂♀ 1186 20 H 0.7645 W Q 2 MO MO 2012 D C
Moyano et al. (2017) 448 16 0.6755 LH Q 1 MO MO 2017 J C
Ortiz (2012) 162 20 H 0.7645 W Q 2 MO MO 2012 D C
Ortiz et al. (2016) ♂♀ 313 20 H 0.7645 Q 1 MO MO 2016 J C
Quinn-Nilas & Kennett (2018) 222 21 H 0.8385 W Q 1 MO MO 2018 J C
Rudman et al. (2013) 153 19 H 0.7645 M Q O S, AT MO 2013 J C
350 19 H 0.7645 M Q O S, AT MO 2013 J C
Sakaluk & Milhausen (2012) 15 19 H 0.8385 Q, O 2, O AT, MO MO 2012 J C
88 19 H 0.8385 Q, O 2, O AT, MO MO 2012 J C
Shapurian & Hojat (1985) ♂Iran 199 22 H 0.5610 A Q O S, AT PSU, MO 1985 J C
♂UK 780 12–18 0.8270 W Q O S, AT PSU, MO 1985 J C
♀UK 761 12–18 0.8270 W Q O S, AT PSU, MO 1985 J C
Shin et al. (2011) 3,609 21 H 0.7935 EA Q O AT MO 2011 J C
2180 21 H 0.7935 EA Q O AT MO 2011 J C
Sierra et al. (2007) 151 23 H 0.8330 Q 1 MO MO 2007 J C
249 23 H 0.8330 Q 1 MO MO 2007 J C
Sierra et al. (2009) 700 22 H 0.6565 LH Q 1 MO MO 2009 J C
Sierra et al. (2017) 402 41 M 0.8330 LH Q 2 MO MO 2017 J C
402 41 M 0.8330 LH Q 2 MO MO 2017 J C
Sprecher et al. (2013) ♂A 468 19 H 0.7645 EA Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♀A 271 19 H 0.7645 EA Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♂B 39 19 H 0.7645 B Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♀B 66 19 H 0.7645 B Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♂H 126 19 H 0.7645 LH Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♀H 73 19 H 0.7645 LH Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♂W 4,182 19 H 0.7645 W Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
♀W 2425 19 H 0.7645 W Q O AT CS, PSLA 2013 J WS
Ubillos et al. (2016) 1341 14 M 0.8330 LH Q 1 MO MO 2016 J C
1578 14 M 0.8330 LH Q 1 MO MO 2016 J C
Walfield (2018) 617 35 M 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2018 J C
603 35 M 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2018 J C
Zhang et al. (2008) 112 18 H 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2008 J C
154 18 H 0.7645 W Q 1 MO MO 2008 J C
Zurbriggen & Morgan (2006) 109 19 H 0.7645 M Q O AT MO 2006 J C
225 19 H 0.7645 M Q O AT MO 2006 J C

Note. Numbers under questionnaire refer to double standard scale of Caron (1), sexual double standard scale of Muehlenhard (2), personal acceptance of double standard scale by Milhausen (3), scale for the assessment of sexual double standards in youth by Emmerink (4), premarital sexual standards scale by Reiss (5). H = high educational level; M = mixed; O = other; MO = mixed/other; A = Asia(n); UK = United Kingdom; US = United States; W = White/Caucasian; B = Black; LH = Latino/a/Hispanic; H = Hispanic; EA = East-Asian; Q = questionnaire; S = stereotypes; AT = attitudes; PSLA = premarital sex in love/with affection; PSU = premarital sex unspecified; CS = casual sex; ACT = sexual activity; J = journal publication; D = dissertation; C = correlational; L = longitudinal; WS = within-subjects design.