Table 6.
Results for the Multiple-Moderator Model for Studies Examining Endorsement of Sexual Double Standards With Likert-Type-Scale Questionnaires (#k = 47, #IS = 85, #ES = 129).
| Moderator | β (SE) | 95% CI | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.155 (0.081) | [−0.004, 0.314] | 1.925 | .314 |
| SDS conceptualization (reference category stereotype) | ||||
| Attitude | −0.178 (0.055)* | [−0.328, −0.028] | −2.346 | .021 |
| Other | −0.452 (0.110)** | [−0.669, −0.236] | −4.130 | <.001 |
| Questionnaire type (reference category DSS)a | ||||
| SDSS | 0.427 (0.098)** | [0.234, 0.621] | 4.367 | <.001 |
| Gender equality country | −1.118 (0.380)* | [−1.870, −0.366] | −2.942 | .004 |
| Publication year | −0.006 (0.004) | [−0.014, 0.002] | −1.400 | .164 |
| Omnibus test | F(5,123) = 7.998** | <.001 | ||
| σ2 | I 2 | ΔR2 | ||
| Variance level 1b | 0.057** | 57.89 | 0.10 | |
| Variance level 3 | 0.041** | 42.06 | 0.49 | |
Note. #k = number of studies, #IS = number of independent samples; #ES= number of effect sizes; CI= confidence interval; SDS = sexual double standard; DSS = double standard scale.
“Other questionnaire” was a redundant predictor (r = −1.0 with “social cognition other”) and therefore dropped from the model. b Variance was examined at the following levels: 1 = variance within samples, that is, between effect sizes from the same sample, 2 = variance within studies, that is, between samples from the same study, 3 = variance between studies. As there was zero variance at the second level in the overall model, this level was not presented in this table.
p < .05. **p < .01.