Table 4.

Comparison of correlation values of the proposed algorithm and LIBRA. The correlation is between the PD estimates and radiologists’ BI‐RADS assessments

N = 91 exams (182 mammograms)	Proposed	LIBRA	Difference	P‐value
CC	0.81 [0.74, 0.85]	0.58 [0.43, 0.68]	0.24 [0.12, 0.41]	<0.0001a
MLO	0.79 [0.7, 0.85]	0.71 [0.57, 0.79]	0.08 [−0.02, 0.24]	0.18
CC‐MLO averaged	0.85 [0.8, 0.89]	0.69 [0.55, 0.77]	0.17 [0.08, 0.3]	0.006a

^aStatistically significant with significance level was 0.0167 after Bonferroni correction.