Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;10(3):452. doi: 10.3390/nano10030452

Table 1.

Different TiO2-based composites for photocatalytic degradation of MO under visible light irradiation.

Composite Visible Light Source Catalyst Mass Dye Concentration Degradation Efficiency References
(Fe, N, B)-TiO2 1000 W‡tungsten halogen lamp 70 mg MO, (20 mg/L), 50 mL 300 min, 73% [47]
Pt-fullerene/TiO2 8 W halogen lamp 50 mg MO, (3.3 mg/L), 50 mL 120 min, 52% [48]
br-TiO2/g-C3N4 300 W Xe lamp 100 mg MO, (10 mg/L), 100 mL 180 min, 55% [49]
TiO2-Sn-La 150 W Xe lamp 80 mg MO, (5 mg/L), 50 mL 120 min, 99% [50]
PMo12/TiO2/Ag 300 W Xe lamp 20 mg MO, (20 mg/L), 20 mL 120 min, 99% [51]
L-Histidine (C, N codoped)-TiO2-CdS 50 W LED arrays 300 mg MO, (10 mg/L), 200 mL 120 min, 95% [52]
In2S3/anatase TiO2 @Ti3C2Tx 300 W Xe lamp 60 mg MO, (20 mg/L), 100 mL 60 min, 90% [32]
TiO2-graphene 450 W Xe lamp 30 mg MO, (10 mg/L), 50 mL 180 min, 99% [53]
N-doped rutile TiO2 300 W Xe lamp 50 mg MO, (10 mg/L), 25 mL 120 min, 92% [54]
BPQDs/Ti3C2@TiO2 400 W metal halide lamp 50 mg MO, (10 mg/L), 50 mL 60 min, 93% This work