TABLE 6.
Relationship between ventriculo-arterial coupling and left ventricular efficiency and Eadyn according to a mixed-effect regression model.
| 95% confidence | |||
| Fixed effects | Estimate | interval | p value |
| Ventriculo-arterial coupling indexes | |||
| VAC (Ea/Ees) | –0.414 | −0.486 to −0.343 | <0.001 |
| Ees, mmHg⋅ml–1 | 2.271 | 1.766 to 2.776 | <0.001 |
| Ea, mmHg⋅ml–1 | –0.933 | −1.196 to −0.671 | <0.001 |
| Left ventricular energetics | |||
| LVeff,% | 0.026 | 0.021 to 0.031 | <0.001 |
| Stroke work, mmHg⋅l | 0.107 | 0.079 to 0.134 | <0.001 |
| Potential energy mmHg⋅l | –0.121 | −0.160 to −0.082 | <0.001 |
Estimates reflect the average change in Eadyn per unit increase of the fixed effect. Eadyn, dynamic arterial elastance; Ees, left ventricular end-systolic elastance; Ea, effective arterial elastance; VAC, ventriculo-arterial coupling; LVeff, left ventricular mechanical efficiency.