Table 2. Passing–Bablok regression analysis comparing the handheld meter (HHM) and the gold-standard (GS) enzymatic colorimetric test.
Parameters | GS enzymatic colorimetric method (mmol/L) | Handheld meter (mmol/L) |
---|---|---|
Lowest value | 0.11 | 0.10 |
Highest value | 3.94 | 7.10 |
Arithmetic mean | 1.25 | 1.90 |
Median | 1.16 | 1.70 |
Standard deviation | 0.89 | 1.56 |
Standard error of the mean | 0.057 | 0.099 |
Regression equation | HHM = −0.19 + 1.69 GS | |
Systematic differences | ||
Intercept A | −0.187 | |
95% CI | −0.215 to −0.162 | |
Proportional differences | ||
Slope B | 1.691 | |
95% CI | 1.657–1.724 | |
Random differences | ||
Residual standard deviation (RSD) | 0.137 | |
± 1.96 RSD interval | −0.268 to 0.268 | |
Linear model validity | ||
Cusum test for linearity | Significant deviation from linearity (P < 0.01) | |
Spearman rank correlation coefficient | ||
Correlation coefficient | 0.984 | |
Significance level | P < 0.0001 | |
95% CI | 0.979–0.987 |
Note:
CI, confidence interval.