Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;8:e8933. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8933

Table 2. Passing–Bablok regression analysis comparing the handheld meter (HHM) and the gold-standard (GS) enzymatic colorimetric test.

Parameters GS enzymatic colorimetric method (mmol/L) Handheld meter (mmol/L)
Lowest value 0.11 0.10
Highest value 3.94 7.10
Arithmetic mean 1.25 1.90
Median 1.16 1.70
Standard deviation 0.89 1.56
Standard error of the mean 0.057 0.099
Regression equation HHM = −0.19 + 1.69 GS
Systematic differences
Intercept A −0.187
95% CI −0.215 to −0.162
Proportional differences
Slope B 1.691
95% CI 1.657–1.724
Random differences
Residual standard deviation (RSD) 0.137
± 1.96 RSD interval −0.268 to 0.268
Linear model validity
Cusum test for linearity Significant deviation from linearity (P < 0.01)
Spearman rank correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficient 0.984
Significance level P < 0.0001
95% CI 0.979–0.987

Note:

CI, confidence interval.