Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 9;9(1):1746113. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1746113

Table 1.

The basic characteristics and main outcomes of the 8 included randomized controlled trials.

Study ID Phase Tumor Type Treatment groups
Line Number of patients
Median Follow-up (month) Overall Survival
Intervention group Control group Total With
LM (%)
Without
LM (%)
HR (95% CI) for Patients with LM HR (95% CI) for patients without LM
IMpower130 3 Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Nab-paclitaxel Carboplatin + Nab-paclitaxel 1 679 100(15%) 579(85%) 18.5 vs 18.8 1.04 (0.63 ~ 1.72) 0.73 (0.57 ~ 0.92)
IMvigor211 3 Urothelial Carcinoma Atezolizumab *Investigator’s choice Chemotherapy >1 931 268(29%) 663(71%) 17.3 0.84(0.64 ~ 1.09) 0.83(0.69 ~ 1.0)
IMpower133 3 Small-Cell Lung Cancer Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide Placebo +
Carboplatin + Etoposide
1 403 149 (37%) 254 (63%) 13.9 0.81 (0.55 ~ 1.20) 0.64 (0.45 ~ 0.90)
KEYNOTE-045 3 Urothelial Carcinoma Pembrolizumab *Investigator’s choice Chemotherapy >1 541 186(34%) 355(66%) 14.1 0.85 (0.61 ~ 1.20) 0.67 (0.50 ~ 0.89)
ATTRACTION-2 3 Gastric or Gastro-esophageal Junction Cancer Nivolumab placebo >1 493 106(22%) 387(78%) 8.87 vs 8.59 0.67 (0.42 ~ 1.07) 0.64 (0.50 ~ 0.81)
CheckMate025 3 Renal-Cell Carcinoma Nivolumab Everolimus >1 821 187 (23%) 634(77%) 22 0.81 (0.55–1.18) 0.73 (0.58–0.92)
Checkmate214 3 Renal-Cell Carcinoma Nivolumab + Ipilimumab Sunitinib 1 847 177(21%) 670(79%) 25.2 0.64 (0.42–0.96) 0.66 (0.51–0.85)
IMpower132 3 Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Atezolizumab + Carboplatin+ Cisplatin/Pemetrexed Carboplatin + Cisplatin/Pemetrexed 1 578 73(13%) 505(87%) 14.8 0.99 (0.57–1.70) 0.76 (0.59–0.98)

PD-1: programmed cell death 1; PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1; LM: liver metastases; HR: hazard ratios; CI: confidence interval: *Investigator’s choice chemotherapy: paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine.