Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 3;214(4):1005–1018. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302869

Table 1. Species and data sets used in the present study.

Species Reference Outgroup Reference Mating type AIC b βfull βγ βmax
A. thaliana Alonso-Blanco et al. (2016) A. lyrata Novikova et al. (2016) Selfing 231.3, 227.3 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.45
A. lyrata Novikova et al. (2016) A. thaliana Alonso-Blanco et al. (2016) Outcrossing 247.4, 243.4 0.50 0.35 0.34 0.36
C. rubella Koenig et al. (2019) C. grandiflora Ågren et al. (2014) Selfing 201.4, 200.3 0.43 0.39 0.26 2.86
C. grandiflora Ågren et al. (2014) C. rubella Koenig et al. (2019) Outcrossing 321.9, 327.8 0.52 0.30 0.27 0.36
S. habrochaites Aflitos et al. (2014) S. lycopersicon Aflitos et al. (2014) Selfing 141.5, 148.1 0.21 0.23 0.13 3.61
S. huaylasense Aflitos et al. (2014) S. lycopersicon Aflitos et al. (2014) Outcrossing 87.1, 121.5 0.54 0.31 0.15 3.89
S. propinquum Mace et al. (2013) S. bicolor Mace et al. (2013) Selfing 163.8, 159.8 0.37 0.26 0.26 0.34
Z. mays (teosinte) Chia et al. (2012) T. dactyloides Chia et al. (2012) Outcrossing 208.1, 204.1 0.29 0.19 0.18 0.45
P. trichocarpa Evans et al. (2014) P. nigra Faivre-Rampant et al. (2016) Outcrossing 318.9, 319.6 0.42 0.22 0.16 2.21
D. melanogaster Huang et al. (2014) D. simulans Stanley and Kulathinal (2016) Outcrossing 422.7, 535.5 0.70 0.41 0.33 0.51
H. timareta Martin et al. (2013) H. melpomene Martin et al. (2013) Outcrossing 208.2, 204.2 0.44 0.21 0.21 2.78

Note: AIC values were estimated by polyDFE for models with and without the effects of beneficial mutations, respectively (bold numbers showed significance < 0.05). The same applies to βfull and βγ as well. βfull and βγ were the shape parameters for full DFE and γ DFE model, respectively. βmax corresponds to the maximum value of those estimated by polyDFE for each ranked gene bin. AIC, Akaike information criterion; DFE, distribution of fitness effects.