Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 7;11:181. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00181

TABLE 4.

FORT and FOI in different POSEIDON groups according to the use of agonist vs. antagonist protocol.

FORT P-value FOI P-value
Group 1 Agonist 0.79 (0.76, 0.82) 0.376 0.72 (0.69, 0.75) 1.000
Antagonist 0.76 (0.73, 0.79) 0.71 (0.68, 0.75)
Group2 Agonist 0.76 (0.72, 0.81) 0.760 0.68 (0.64, 0.72) 0.463
Antagonist 0.73 (0.69, 0.77) 0.69 (0.65, 0.73)
Group3 Agonist 1.37 (1.29, 1.44) 0.034 1.23 (1.16, 1.31) 0.889
Antagonist 1.28 (1.22, 1.35) 1.23 (1.17, 1.30)
Group4 Agonist 1.20 (1.14, 1.27) 0.132 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) 0.966
Antagonist 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 1.02 (0.97, 1.07)
Group5 Agonist 0.85 (0.84, 0.85) <0.001 0.84 (0.83, 0.84) <0.001
Antagonist 0.85 (0.84, 0.87) 0.83 (0.82, 0.85)
Total 0.04 0.008

FORT, follicular output rate; FOI, follicle-to-oocyte index. Arithmetic mean (95% CI)/N (%) calculated using EmpowerStats (www.empowerstats.com) and R. Kruskal-Wallis rank test for continuous variables.