TABLE 3.
Goodness-of-fit indices of the SACIE-R scale according to sample type.
| Model | Sample | S-B χ2 (df) | χ2 (df) | χ2/df | RMSEA (CI) | CFI | NNFI | IFI | |
| EFA 14 items and 3 factors | Whole sample | 3 factors, 14 items | 404.72 (74) | 459.27 (74) | 6.20 | 0.083 (0.075–0.091) | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.85 |
| 3 factors, 12 items | 157.48 (51) | 178.14 (51) | 3.49 | 0.057 (0.047–0.067) | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.94 | ||
| Students | 3 factors, 14 items | 245.22 (74) | 270.87 (74) | 3.66 | 0.085 (0.073–0.096) | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.85 | |
| 3 factors, 12 items | 117.81 (51) | 130.04 (51) | 2.55 | 0.064 (0.049–0.079) | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.93 | ||
| Teachers | 3 factors, 12 items | 171.38 (51) | 198.76 (51) | 3.90 | 0.085 (0.071–0.099) | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.88 | |
| 3 factors, 8 items | 59.34 (17) | 70.75 (17) | 4.16 | 0.088 (0.064–0.112) | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.94 | ||
| CFA 15 items and 3 factors (SACIE-R proposal by Forlin et al., 2011) | Whole sample | 3 factors, 15 items | 479.77 (87) | 536.27 (87) | 6.16 | 0.084 (0.076–0.091) | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| 3 factors, 11 items | 125.85 (41) | 147.16 (41) | 3.59 | 0.057 (0.045–0.068) | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 | ||
| Students | 3 factors, 11 items | 76.07 (41) | 86.50 (41) | 2.11 | 0.052 (0.033–0.069) | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | |
| Teachers | 3 factors, 11 items | 157.26 (41) | 188.02 (41) | 4.58 | 0.094 (0.078–0.109) | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.87 | |
| Whole sample | 3 factors, 10 items | 63.25 (32) | 72.90 (32) | 1.98 | 0.05 (0.03–01.08) | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.94 | |
| Students | 3 factors 10 items | 63.23 (32) | 72.75 (32) | 1.81 | 0.06 (0.04–0.08) | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | |
| Teachers | 3 factors 10 items | 109.71 (32) | 131.27 (32) | 3.42 | 0.08 (0.07–0.10) | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
S-B = Satorra Bentler; df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = Mean Quadratic Approximation Error (≤0.08); CI = RMSEA Confidence Interval; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; NNFI = Non-Normed Fit Index; IFI = Incremental Fit Index; CFI, NNFI, IFI (≥0.90); χ2/df (≤5.00).