Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002120.pub3

Serfaty 1998.

Methods Randomisation method not stated. 
 Open trial ‐ no blinding used. 
 1016 women initially randomised, 182 drop outs ( bleeding irregularities, adverse effects, ). 
 213 of the initial group randomised had dysmenorrhoea, with 173 women with dysmenorrhoea analysed.
Participants Inclusion: regular menstrual cycles (24‐35 days cycles), aged 18‐45 years old, BMI of 18‐29 kg/m2 
 Exclusion: smokers, contraindications to OC use, drugs use, women who had just given birth or had an abortion. 
 Age: DSG group ‐ 26.2, GSD group ‐ 26.3 
 Location: France
Interventions 1. Ethinyl estradiol 0.02mg, 0.15mg desogestrel 
 2. Ethinyl estradiol 0.02mg, 0.075mg gestodene 
 Duration: 6 cycles.
Outcomes Dysmenorrhoea (mild, moderate, severe)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk No data provided
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No data provided
Free of selective reporting? Unclear risk No adverse events
Power calculations Low risk  
Dropouts reported Low risk 182/1016 (85 from desogestrel and 97 from gestodene group)
Baseline comparability Low risk